this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

196

16504 readers
12 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Emacs > vim

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I prefer emacs too, but:

  • Emacs's C-x C-c isn't likely any more able to leverage knowledge from other environments than vi's :wq. I guess you could be using a graphical version of emacs and use the menus.

  • On my system, current versions of vim do appear, by default, to show a screen telling you how to quit. A test of emacs -Q to bring up a default emacs environment in a terminal environment doesn't appear to do that. It instead directs you to the "C-h C-a about emacs page", which isn't likely to help beginners. It probably should at least reference the top-level help at C-h C-h or the tutorial at C-h C-t.

  • There are text-mode menus in emacs, but I normally use emacs in the terminal with the menus hidden and don't use them. F10 will cause them to drop down, but I'm not sure how intuitive that is. looks further Okay, using emacs -Q to test a vanilla environment, it does look like the menus are visible by default in the terminal. If you're in an environment with mouse support enabled - it looks like gpm in a Linux console works, but curiously-enough, it doesn't seem to work in urxvt, xterm, or gnome-terminal for me -- but at least in some terminal environments, you can use the mouse to operate the terminal-mode menus, so I guess ease-of-use point for emacs there.

EDIT: It does look like there's a GTK-based vim that has graphical menus these days, so vim can probably do the menu thing too, but at least on my system, when I launch it, I get a regular terminal vim instance.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

:q!

You wouldn't want to ruin your file by accidentally saving your random flailing.

[–] Cableferret@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A: you're wrong, Vim over Emacs every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

B: what's so damned hard about alt+f4, open up Google, spend the next two weeks googling Vim lessons and Vim tutors and reading length articles about vim commands, and then finally coming back to Vim just to type :wq?

[–] ouigol@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can run vim inside of emacs therefore emacs > vim

[–] nakal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You can also browse web in emacs.

emacs > chrome
emacs > firefox

[–] power@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Vim and Emacs fans trying to justify their archaic IDE with "useful keybinds" which require you to play twister using your fingers vs. VSCode enjoyer just using the IDE because it's easy

[–] kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

So how do you move your cursor?

[–] bl_r@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Emacs is one of the better desktop environments I’ve used. I just wish it had a good text editor.

[–] iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it becomes kinda usable with evil mode

[–] bl_r@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I fully agree, I used doom emacs for a year before going back to vim. I loved it, but after a lot of thinking I realized that I was getting too distracted by its many shiny features and that I was only using it for the vim bindings, therefore everything else is bloat.

I would never be upset using doom emacs, which is significantly more than I could say about other editors/ides.