this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
61 points (95.5% liked)

Green Energy

2206 readers
113 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Any reason they're counting energy by power?

[–] hallettj@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Power tells you how large of a gap in grid capacity-vs-demand storage can cover while renewables are below peak production. That's the important number, as long as the energy stored is sufficient to last until renewable output goes back up.

Giving an energy storage number by itself could be misleading because it seems the batteries that have been built take longer than an hour to discharge. So for example 26 GWh storage does not equal 26 GW grid capacity.

But this article, like many others does seem to be loose with the power-vs-energy metrics:

If 6,600 MW doesn’t sound like that much, consider it is enough to supply electricity to about 6.6 million homes in California for 4 hours

Maybe the implication is that the total energy storage is 26,400 MWh?

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Perhaps in the same vein as what a power plant produces?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Possibly because throughout is important, possibly because MWh seems to confuse a lot of people. People are used to thinking of electricity in its flowing state and in the modern era of batteries have generally been given it in time of operation of what the battery is for.

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Probably pretty consumption is increasing faster than their capacity

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 year ago

Tesla fanboys

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's 6.6 gigawatts! Just need to get this state over 88 mph and we've got a chance of escaping this awful timeline.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So step 1 would be to break off California from the rest of the American continent so you don't have to accelerate all of that?

[–] hotair@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

The rest of the world always follows. It's been weird. Catalytic converters, efficiency standards and all that.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone needs to get their units figured out. Storage is measured in Wh.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Storage is measured that way; discharge rate in watts.

Both need to be planned to handle peak shaving and overnight storage.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Throughout the article they're mixing the units up. Not just the title.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that enough to farm a bitcoin?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Many times over.

We'd be better off if bitcoin transitioned off of proof-of-work though