this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
137 points (96.6% liked)

Fediverse

28216 readers
120 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaboom36@ani.social 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been on this instance for a about a month now, and I've not seen anything remotely like that

It would not shock me in the least if the reason this instance was put on that list was because of one of those "all weebs are pedos" jerks

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when a bunch of instances banned nsfwlemmy because they allegedly allowed pedo content, when in truth they just decided to not moderate fictional characters where the age was not obvious (like potentially 18, but plus / minus a couple years)?

I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues instead of chasing ghosts, because that instance is a toxic cesspool of assholes and disinformation.

[–] cacheson@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

As much as I would love to see it, I don't think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then they might as well merge both instances.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

That's how it was originally. They spun lemmygrad off to an entirely different serve because they made a halfhearted attempt at going mainstream, which seems to have lasted about 5 minutes

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

allegedly

A bit weird that they didnt want proof of misconduct, but hey

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the lemmy.ml admins/lemmy devs, didn't really expect anything else from them.

[–] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 5 points 1 year ago

One of 'em are cool, the other a straight up fascist. Such is the the world.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

thanks, not my own work entirely. @ludrol@bookwormstory.social has been a godsend in helping me get everything set up moderation wise as well as second opinions on things. I mostly handle the technical side of things.

[–] nix@merv.news 34 points 1 year ago

It looks like ani.social they have a rule to forbid the content though might have just been posts that weren’t reported

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago

Well that’s a load of bullshit

Is ani.social federated with anyone?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ml seems to be coming a bit unwound. They have been super ban happy lately but enforce the rules very unevenly. Hexbears can post pig shit gifs, but citing mainstream political science gets you banned pretty reliably if you do it under the wrong gaze. It really is starting to look more and more like fediverse cancer.

[–] LaLiLuLuCo@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Hell to the yea.