this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
147 points (82.7% liked)

Linux

48239 readers
503 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's been my default choice for years now, and I've recently switched to the Debian-based version. Couldn't be happier.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

I switched with Bookworm. It's great!

[–] poinck@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I never used a spin-off of a unique distribution of GNU/Linux on my own computer, except the dark Ubuntu times. It seemed right at the time.

Now, I don't see why I should recommend a distro that tries to be easier on new users when the original has sane defaults and is closer to upstream regarding all the tools and software bundled with it.

Here are my recommendations for new users in that order (regardless of their computer knowledge): Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Arch, Slackware, LFS. Friends can help with the installation and should consider easy maintainability when dealing with users who just want to use it.

My personal preferences are Gentoo and Debian.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I haven't used Mint in years, but back in the day downstream distros from Debian often worked better for desktop users than Debian itself.

This is because of Debian's 'stability' philosophy. This meant that bugs could stick around for years in Debian stable after being fixed upstream.

Of course, with each new stable release, there should be fewer bugs so this problem should become less over time.

I've considered switching from Manjaro to Debian on my laptop, but then I think about how great the AUR is. That's pretty much the main appeal for Manjaro over Debian, for me.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Before switching to LMDE, I did try just using Debian with Cinnamon, thinking it would be pretty much the same experience. I did not really enjoy the experience. There were too many niceties missing that I had taken for granted with Mint. I wasn't interested in spending my time hunting down all the tweaks and packages to make those changes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShitOnABrick@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Linux mint at least in my experience seems to be one of those shit just works distros

[–] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

I don't use it myself, but it's been my main recommendation for newbies for years for that reason. No complaints yet, even from the less tech-literate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stella@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

I think most mainstream distros have reached a point of diminishing returns, and that's a good thing.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 13 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=6Tln-eBAq-k

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] lordgoose@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

I've been using Mint for a few months now after initially trying Fedora and Kubuntu. Mint has been by far my favorite experience and I've even gotten a few people converted to Linux via Mint. Definitely my recommendation for any Linux newbies.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I've been using Linux for a decade, and I think Mint is great!

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I sure wish I could get off Windows and onto Linux, but as a VR developer, it really is not feasible. Sucks

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I run a small business, but I'm also I'm an embedded systems developer on ARM processors for my products. Our toolchain is Windows-specific. That and the Adobe suite which I also need for my business keep my primary work machine Windows.

My laptop is Linux but even that creates occasional hassles with my work flow and presentations.

[–] Molten_Moron@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least you get Windows and not the abomination that is MacOS.

cries in iOS developer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_like_cats@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me here playing VR games on Linux: wut?

My VR runs fine on Linux, just I cannot develop it on Linux as the tools are simply not available.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed! My grandmother loves it. :^)

And I love your grandmother :D

[–] Maragato@eslemmy.es 7 points 1 year ago

For a home user with recent hardware in my opinion the system to beat is openSUSE Tumbleweed. It is a stable and rolling distribution, that is, it has the best of both worlds.

[–] kelvie@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've used Linux for over two decades (red hat to Gentoo to Ubuntu to arch) and I must say it'll be a tough sell to get me back to an RPM or a debian based distro solely due to how god awfully slow the package managers (dpkg and rpm) are.

Since Docker came along and brought with it the ride of Alpine and APK, it made me realize that system upgrades on a modern processor, fast internet, and an SSD should take seconds, not minutes.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I too think Cinnamon is a pretty great Experience. I am using KDE and heard from many people that it feels better, its more unified and has way more features.

Wayland is important for security, and Mint will need a long time to adopt that. There are already apps only running on Wayland for reasons.

KDE is a bit unstable as its a huge project. I hope that will get better in Plasma 6.

I sure wish to have something like KDE more stable. But once you are used to it, its just better. Things that are not there yet on Mint are on KDE since years.

Its a bit of a mess as its so old. Extensions need to be cleaned up. But like, Dolphin extensions are so great, I dont know an equivalent on Cinnamon.

Also the distro model is the standard one. A Fedora Atomic Cinnamon variant, with modern presets and everything working, would be a great thing to install anywhere. Automatic atomic updates, easy version upgrades, transparent system changes and resets being just one command away.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cinnamon is more unified, but I don't think any DE has as many features as KDE.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can get a Cinnamon image via U-Blue.

U-Blue in general is a nice collection of images because not only are there various unofficial options, but a lot of things like RPMFusion, etc. are preconfigured in their versions of the main editions (SilverBlue, Kinoite, Sericea, Onyx).

Or you can just rebase regular SilverBlue (or one of the three other official variants) to one of those images if you're running it already. Can roll back if you don't like it.

I doubt there'll be an official edition until Cinnamon has full Wayland support since Fedora is going all in on that now.

In the meantime, the community has it covered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I never ”got" why people like Mint so much. it is mid

[–] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think mid translates to reliable and boring. Which is desirable for an OS.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I want my OS to be as fucking boring as humanly possible.

[–] onion@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Is it more or less boring than Fedora

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mint is for people who just want stuff to work and not fiddle about too much. It does that very well. Anyone who simply wants an alternative to Windows that is easy to get into and use will be perfectly happy with it. If you want to customise everything to a t, Mint isn't for you

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Low bullshit quotient. No sudden garbage.

I switched when one guy unilaterally decided Ubuntu would completely flip its user interface, for no goddamn reason, the night before a long-term-support feature freeze.

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 17 points 1 year ago

It's simple and solid enough to give to people who don't know what they're doing, and its Debian/Ubuntu base makes it flexible enough to not slow down power users who want to start modifying it. Other distros that might fit this bill keep shooting themselves in the foot and going off in weird directions, while Linux Mint has been a reputable no-BS distro for a very long time. It's a workhorse distro without any gimmicks and that's the point.

[–] confusedwiseman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mint was my “gateway distro” to get away from windows as a daily driver. It still is my daily driver and it’s given me enough guardrails to not screw it up too badly and learn.

I’m looking to go further up stream towards Debian. I’ve looked at arch and “arch that’s not allowed to be called arch because it has a gui installer”, but I’m not ready/able/“risk-tolerant-enough” to keep that stable as my daily driver. Fedora dormant seem quite right for me.

I really like mint, it meets my needs, has treated me well.

[–] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

From experience, ignore your instincts and give pure Arch a try. It's a lot more stable than you'd think, and their wiki has very thorough instructions for everything.

It's a bit of a trial by fire on your terminal knowledge, but you'll learn a ton in the process. Worst case, you get fed up trying and just go to Fedora or something after.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i dont have the energy or patience to go to a wiki for my OS, i just want it to work and not be proprietary. besides setting up wine staging and pipewire it's generally been smooth sailing

[–] confusedwiseman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’m with you here, sometimes I’m really lazy and don’t want to mess with it. Other times I’m hell-bent on doing something I know how to do in a GUI through terminal.

Mint has let me keep my system OS rock solid, and I’m not afraid to try about anything in the vm. Reinstall when time permits or just roll back to a snapshot.

I’ve got time shift installed, but I use my computer for work, so there’s some draw to stability and having everything just work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I would echo that but suggest going to EndevourOS. EOS is a lot easier to install for normal people. What you get is insanely close to pure Arch.

I agree that running Arch is easier than people think. It is very stable. Also, because everything you could want is in the repositories ( and up-to-date ) it does not become a spaghetti like mess over time. No more third-party repos. No more PPAs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpookyOperative@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious to know what arch-based distro you're talking about?

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Has to be Manjaro or EndeavourOS. If they're just getting their teeth in, my guess is on the former.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] p5f20w18k@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I went Win > Mint > Manjaro (for a day) > Arch

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not lmde if you want something closer to Debian?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gunpachi@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It just works. Whenever anyone I know tells me they are going to install ubuntu or try out linux for the first time - I just tell them to install linux mint and they've had no complaints so far.

(Even though I only use mint as a fallback distro, I really appreciate it being there)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's reliable, customisable, everything is doable in a GUI, and has a Windows UX that people are familiar with.

[–] Sh1ft@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have used some distros by now and I do love mint. But a few years back every major upgrade of mint lead to bugs and me reinstalling my system. So far the only Distro i tried that just keeps working is MX Linux on my old laptop.

Because I want to get rid of windows I installed Nobara. I love to play games. I works pretty good, but since only one guy ist maintaining it, it should be not considered a daily driver.

I am still not happy because it dont want to switch between distros for gaming and working.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›