this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
949 points (99.1% liked)

World News

46195 readers
3228 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 34 points 12 hours ago

As a dumbass American... Go Canada! Fuck yeah good work!

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Meirdas Touch once again. The orange shit stain backs a Con and all voters take that as a sign that the person is a piece of shit and votes opposite.

Sometimes it works nicely.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Top Poilievre defense he did use a lot of Trump's talking points and techniques. Branding himself as Trump light.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

He showed who he was, and people believed him, as they should.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 46 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Little PP got his ass kicked. I love it !

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know how it works there. Was Pierre running in two races?

Would there have a special election for this seat if he had won both?

What are the odds he loses support and goes quiet after losing both, especially his backup incumbent election? (Knowing hard losses used to discourage people, but not always now)

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Prime Minister is similar to Speaker of the House- everyone gets elected in their district and then the majority party (or in the case of a ~~functional democracy~~ multi-party system, a coalition of parties that add up to 51% of the elected officials) picks their own Speaker/Prime Minister without further input from the public. In practice, if you're already the party leader then you're sure (95%~) to be the prime minister after your party wins/gets the biggest share in the election

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No one actually "runs for Prime Minister". The Prime Minister is simply the leader of the governing party. That is determined by the number of seats each party wins. The PM is almost always an elected MP, but as demonstrated for the past few weeks they don't have to be.

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 4 points 12 hours ago

Thank you! I understand now.

[–] OctaviaMeowzly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Hopefully Britain follows Canadas footsteps (as we might vote in wish trump)

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Please, he's Pound-Stretcher Trump. Not even Poundland would stock him.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What elections are coming up in the UK? I thought Starmer won a majority just last year.

[–] OctaviaMeowzly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

no, but local elections are

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 80 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm happy for you Canada.

You succeeded where America couldn't.

Are y'all accepting asylum for programmers / tech professionals?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If you're serious, start looking for companies hiring up here. As I understand it's not easy, even for economic class immigrants, but I work in tech and I work with many immigrants (albeit not usually from the US, but it's a different world now). Mind you - please look carefully into the financial impacts as it is a change from the US. Salaries are lower and taxes generally higher, which may or may not be offset in your context in other ways (healthcare a big one, income tax deductions, etc.) But many people, myself included, prefer Canada regardless of the reduced compensation. It's not always about money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Asylum, not yet. There's still a treaty on the books recognising America as equivalently safe. Presumably it will get rolled back soon.

If you're serious, I can send you to the points quiz for economic immigrants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 26 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Canada should give Trump the Order of Canada for unifying the country. Do it.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

Felons aren't allowed in Canada

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Having a criminal history would likely make him ineligible.

There's no outright rule against it but several people have been removed from the order for committing crimes.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Fuck you Buffy. Another american scumbag.

[–] Papaslair@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Carney should send a thank you note to Trump for helping him win the election

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 84 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Ironically, Trudeau hanging around for a long as he did may have saved Canada. If this election had happened in the middle of last year, the Conservatives would have probably won and combined with Trump, it would have been a disaster. Possibly the smartest/luckiest thing he has ever done.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

NDP and Conservative leaders lost their own ridings.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

NDP leader already announced he's stepping down and I feel like the conservative has to as well.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 30 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Fuck man, I wish I could afford move to Canada right now.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

No one can afford to move to Canada. Our housing prices are stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 154 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (24 children)

Narrowly.

Are you guys not horrified of what’s happening south? If you interpret this as a win and go on, your country is going to be mega conservative in like a decade.

No, this is an existential crisis, and you need to shut off the propaganda machines before it’s too late.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (1 children)

It's after a full decade of Liberal rule. Do you know how hard it is to win after that long being blamed for everyone's problems? This is huge.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

And damning for Poilievre. He not only had the opportunity to win by banging on the usual triad of "time for a change", "we need to unleash the economy", and "tax relief" but he lost his seat in the process. It's easy to point at the gains the conservatives made, but losing at all after a decade of having another party in place, especially in very difficult times, is impressive. Even if he isn't ousted or doesn't step down, he may be seen by the electorate as incapable of bringing home a win.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago

HitlerPig is his own worst enemy, but nobody tell him.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

this outcome has less to do with trump's actions, and more to do with how the conservatives behaved in spite of those actions.

I think enough people were like me, ready to vote conservative, but then lost faith in the party since they didnt really seem to have a plan on anything once trudeau was gone early. Pollievre's stock tanked once people saw that Trudeau was gone, and what was happening in the world

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

I don't know that 'Conservative' exists anymore. I'm American, but I think these comments work everywhere else, as Authoritarianism rises.

Growing up, I believed that liberal/conservative was just a difference in approach, but not a difference in end-goal. Both 'teams' wanted the country to prosper. In my 40s, now, I clearly see that we have different goals: Liberals want everyone to be prosperous, healthy, fulfilled. Conservatives value the prosperity only of those on top.

You may identify as conservative, little 'c', respect tradition and be careful with spending, etc; but I want you to closely evaluate the actions of people using that label across the globe. A vote for a conservative or right-wing candidate is a vote for the top 1% or less of the population of the planet. They may align with you on some topics, such as religion, abortion, fiscal policies, regulations, and more; but that is a ploy and they are absolutely willing to throw you away as soon as they have your vote and will cut everything you depend on once in power in order to pad their own pockets.

There are certainly perverse incentives and systemic issues that make even liberal politicians support bad policies, but the voter bloc that is 'liberal' wants to make things better for everyone. The conservative politicians, at least in the US where I'm paying attention, seem to be hell-bent on making things worse instead.

This has less to do with Trump's actions, and more to do with how the convervatives behaved...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Really, Mark Carney is what a conservative used to be. These days people who identify as "conservative" are internet weirdos that stress over "wokeness" and whichever conspiracy theory is popular on the internet on that day.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This has been my experience as well and I'd like to highlight your insightful point on how it seemed like both options were still trying to work towards a greater good decades ago.

Modern day conservatism seems entirely based on the ethos that inclusivity has gone too far. Since the world has become (in a very general and oversimplfying sense) more fair and inclusive over time, the ideology now feels inherently regressive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Long as you're voting against fascists man

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump. MCGA, making Canada great again!

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Make Canada 320x200 with 256 colours again!

load more comments
view more: next ›