1300
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dankry@lemmy.world 370 points 10 months ago

There will only be four remaining official ABC accounts: for news, sport, Chinese and the master ABC Australia account.

Somebody let me know when they actually leave twitter. This is a bullshit half measure.

[-] chrisbit@leminal.space 135 points 10 months ago

I agree. I'd like to see them host their own Mastodon and leave a forwarding address on 'X'.

[-] hayalci@fstab.sh 109 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think this might become more common over time.

Up to this point, a lot of the news company's online presence was probably pretty cut and dry. Some of my local news stations have terrible websites that take forever to load, yet those websites were probably cutting edge at some point. One of them has a layout that hasn't changed in at least 10 years.

If their IT department hasn't expanded their skills beyond making and maintaining those original websites, I could totally see a long delay happening before/if they join the fediverse.

[-] ludwig@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

If their IT department hasn't expanded their skills beyond making and maintaining those original websites, I could totally see a long delay happening before/if they join the fediverse.

More likely they aren't given the budget they have requested.

They are also probably busy doing regular IT things like maintaining the IT infrastructure.

Local news stations don't really exist in my country so I don't know how many employees they usually have but it's possible they don't even have an IT department.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LegionEris@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

Some of my local news stations have terrible websites that take forever to load, yet those websites were probably cutting edge at some point.

Nah, most local news sites came online as garbage and will never rise above that status. The cleverest of them came online as bare bones, no frills websites that the affordable local website developer they hired could actually maintain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Roundcat@kbin.social 59 points 10 months ago

So basically they're not leaving, they are silencing their political coverage. They're not going anywhere, they're caving to pressure.

[-] Dankry@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah pretty much, they might as well say "we've decided to sack Jerry from the Social Media team" because this isn't actually exiting twitter it's more like reducing someone's workload lol.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago

What accounts did they actually remove? News and sports seem like they would be most of their presence

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

Yeah this is only a bit as the mainstay of ABC is their news account. But it is a step in the right direction.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 170 points 10 months ago

I hope more broadcasters will follow the BBC’s example and start running their own Mastodon servers.

It would be nice if the BBC instance had more accounts, like for breaking news, though. I know they’re just testing the waters, but they need to try having accounts posting things folks are the most interested in.

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Was a interesting reaction from some in the fediverse stating they would block the BBC instance etc. In reality how welcome are entity's that are seen as corporate?

I also cannot understand why the BBC news is not live, possibly they are experimenting with the moderation and management elements. I guess the news feed would get hit harder than Radio 4.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago

There are some on mastodon that want to live in a fairly defensively disconnected/defederated bubble (compared to many other instances or lemmy/kbin).

And, IMO, that's totally fine and good ... freedom of association gives people and instances that power and it should be embraced when people chose to exercise it TBH, so long as it's done by admins in a way that isn't too autocratic against their users and open and transparent.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Iirc, the big instance declaring immediately that it would defederate with them was one that’s very well known for being strict with moderation and had firm rules about anti-trans instances. Because the BBC has a history of being anti-trans, they defederated.

[-] darreninthenet@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

The BBC has a history of being antitrans?

That's quite a revelation to me, it has more of a reputation of being extremely liberal and indeed any even remotely right winger here usually whinges and moans about how "woke" it is 🤷🏻‍♂️

Do you know what in particular triggered their stance that they believed the BBC anti-trans?

[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 12 points 10 months ago

Do you know what in particular triggered their stance that they believed the BBC anti-trans?

There is a series by Shaun (a Youtuber) about anti trans stuff at the BBC and one article in particular.

First of 4 Videos is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4buJMMiwcg

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

It’s the official broadcaster of TERF island. Even their foremost left wing newspaper is transphobia central.

[-] OctopusKurwa@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

It still makes me so sad to see what's become of the Guardian.

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

That's a total misunderstanding of what the BBC is. As a public broadcaster representing the whole of the UK, it has a duty to represent all views. While I personally disagree with them, gender critical or TERF views are extant in the UK at present and the public conversation on where this will all land legally is still ongoing, therefore they have an obligation to hear from all sides, no matter how unpalatable one of them may be to some.

[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 14 points 10 months ago

Lol no, because as far as i can tell they dont do it with other forms of bigotry like racism.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidance/impartiality-and-racism

BBC is not impartial on racism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I had no role in the instance’s decision; don’t try to argue against their decision with me. I’ve got no say in it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ButtonMcLemming@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I even noticed that ARD and ZDF have their own Mastodon servers/instances. But I'm interested in how the BBC's experimental Mastodon server would fare after their stated six-month time frame.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I wasn’t aware. What’s the BBC Mastodon server?

[-] Dankry@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hadn't heard about it either but according to their blog post announcing it, it's https://social.bbc

Apparently they'll be running it for six months and then determining if it's worth continuing to operate.

[-] RheingoldRiver@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

isn't it pretty hard to determine if it's worthwhile if they aren't going all-in on making it an interesting place with breaking news & accounts for certain types of news etc?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world 156 points 10 months ago

The top comments on X are some idiotic take by an asshat with an agenda and $8. This isn't debate, it is idiocy.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 10 months ago

Everyone has an agenda. The question is whether it's a reasonable one.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

The answer is almost always "not a reasonable one".

[-] victron@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

I disagree. My agenda is not to be an asshole (although I fail more often than not, but I think is a reasonable agenda nonetheless).

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

And now it's time for them to set up a Mastodon instance.

[-] Outsider9042@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

They’ve been there for a while.

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

That's the W I'm looking for

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 37 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The ABC is shutting down almost all of its official accounts on Twitter – now known as X under Elon Musk’s ownership – citing “toxic interactions”, cost and better interaction with ABC content on other social media platforms.

Anderson said the closure of the Insiders, News Breakfast and ABC Politics accounts earlier this year limited the amount of toxic interactions which had grown more prevalent under Musk and made engagement with the shows more positive.

“We also found that closing individual program accounts helps limit the exposure of team members to the toxic interactions that unfortunately are becoming more prevalent on X,” he said.

The announcement comes after the corporation recently shifted resources towards making content for other social media platforms including TikTok and Instagram.

Anderson said the vast majority of the ABC’s social media audience was located on official sites on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.

The ABC is the third big public service broadcaster to remove itself from Twitter, following NPR and PBS in April.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Tbh this sounds like it's more about cost cutting and "toxic" twitter is the excuse to cut down on their use and move resources to other platforms. The fact they have left other accounts up would seem to hint that they will cope with "toxic" users to a certain point.

Still good to see bigger entity's leaving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halfempty@kbin.social 33 points 10 months ago

So this is "Austrailia Broadcasting Corporation", not the ABC (American broadcasting Company) which I am familiar with in the US. I presume they share no more than an acronym.

[-] afos@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago
[-] peanutyam@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

In regards to that twats tweet regarding the “the Australian people” - as a member of “the Australian people” I want to put it on record that that asshat does not speak for many of us here…..some of us are pleased about this (the ABC app is a far better source of news without the rubbish and downright unintelligent comments that come from posting articles on social media anyway….)

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Good move by ABC, but they need to go further.

[-] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 11 points 10 months ago

STOP USING TWEETS ON QANDA THEN! After what happened with Stan Grant ABC really need to evaluate how they use social media sites like Twitter. They needed to do this the moment Stan raised it as an issue and had to step away from his role.

[-] gumnut@aussie.zone 9 points 10 months ago

They have stopped. It’s in the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1300 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

55647 readers
2569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS