this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1827 readers
233 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kind of sounds like ultimately it would have been very illegal to do.

"We made the decision for the nonprofit to retain control of OpenAI after hearing from civic leaders and engaging in constructive dialogue with the offices of the Attorney General of Delaware and the Attorney General of California," OpenAI board chairman Bret Taylor said in a statement.

Asked about Musk's suit on a call with reporters, Altman said, "You all are obsessed with Elon, that's your job — like, more power to you. But we are here to think about our mission and figure out how to enable that. And that mission has not changed."

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You all are obsessed with Elon, that's your job — like, more power to you

Not at all passive aggressive or insincere there.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, looking good while being downwind of Elon being at least partially correct is probably an impossible feat.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 3 points 3 hours ago

And there Sam was, face to face with journos and unable to have his AI assistant come up with a burning retort 😰

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

This kills the OpenAI doesn't it? Im out at town at the moment so i cant easily check, I seem to recall that a large part of their existing investment rounds convert to debt if they can't reorganize.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 7 hours ago

(caveats: ianal, and not familiar enough with US corp law)

took a brief look at this last night and no, don’t think it entirely kills it. they’re changing two notable things: one is converting from whatever they are into a Public Benefit Corp, and the second is turning their weirdo ownership thing into actual stock

while those AG paragraphs do indeed indicate that they got told to get fucked, perverse incentives still apply and saltman still needs to try find a way out of the squeeze they’re in. don’t think they’d be doing either of those changes if they didn’t see a possible path to exploiting it

[–] Mortoc@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

It’s ok, I’m sure their burn rate isn’t catastrophic, they’ll be fine.