this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

The Legend of Zelda

3635 readers
1 users here now

A community for everything related to The Legend of Zelda franchise!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Metallinatus@lemmy.ml
N3DSdude@lemmy.ml
4
NOT NSFW. I Just don’t know how to tag spoilers on mobile. Story discussion in post (kbin.social)
submitted 1 year ago by Uprise42@kbin.social to c/zelda@lemmy.ml
NSFW 6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I’m confused on the story in Totk. I know totk is after BotW, but I’m curious about the other events in the game. The game talks about a war, which is the imprisoning war. This would put it squarely in the “hero is defeated” timeline before the events of a link to the past.

“7 sages seal away Ganon in the imprisoning war”

What is confusing me however is that Rauru is claimed to be the first king of Hyrule. Hyrule however was founded well before the imprisoning war. It was actually founded shortly after the bandaging of the twili and sealing of the sacred realm. Now, in the timeline it states that sage Rauru seals the sacred realm to protect the tri-force. But that isn’t the imprisoning war, nor do I think it’s the same Rauru. But it also states that Skyward Sword Zelda’s descendants founded Hyrule shortly after the sealing of the sacred realm. Skyward Sword Zelda wasn’t a Zonai though.

Does anyone understand the timeline enough to explain what I am missing? It just feels like Rauru is too many people

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't trust Nintendo, there is no timeline. This series is about recurring themes, not about one continuous nation and royal line.

[–] Uprise42@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see why a lot of people say that. It really does start to break apart under a not-so-fine microscope. I was kind of hoping there was something I was missing that would explain why it didn’t make sense but maybe not…

[–] HotBoxghost2743@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I wanted to love Totk but it just doesn't feel like Zelda.. I miss the days of the wind waker. Legend of Zelda the wind waker was my all time favorite Zelda game I'm really hoping they go back to those style of games but with newer shed graphics (obviously)

[–] DonSerrot@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Nobody understands the timeline. Not even Nintendo. If you want proof of that check out this video that goes over the history of Zelda timelines. That's right. Someone made a video not about the timeline itself, but about all the times Nintendo changed the timeline.

Personally, I just go with the stance that each game is a "Legend" of Zelda. Just like how real life has stories of the past that may or may not have happened either as written or even at all. Sometimes those stories even reference older stories and the legends continue on.

[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ve been wondering this too and watching lots of YouTube videos of people explaining their take. Truth is nobody knows and everyone is head canoning how TOTK fits. But I particularly like this video that describes the idea of a dragonbreak having merged the timelines back into one.

This would explain why the Tri-Force is missing. I hope there’s a third game that explains why people seem to have forgotten it’s existence.

[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

The story is a Legend with a lot of details embellished or forgotten over the course of history. It is possible to put together an overall idea of how the history went, but you can’t trust any single game as totally accurate.