this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
239 points (98.8% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

4626 readers
341 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 22 points 1 day ago

Those cops sure would feel dumb if they could read.

[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only he would have worn his police shirt.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then the cops would have known to not stand so close to him! Better than trying to send a message in a bottle. Though they probably caught up with him after discovering a man in a suitcase just before he admitted that he likes to eat his friends.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

You lost me in the second half. I don't recognize those songs.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

In this context I would immediately suspect they are a stalker.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wrong shirt to wear on Opposite Day

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Forgot to say "sudo"

[–] ouRKaoS 3 points 1 day ago
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Context is everything

Someone fighting for social justice: yep

Some dick "sovereign citizen": nup

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think in this context we should be evaluating the shirt in its situation irregardless of the character wearing it.

If Potus 45 wore an anime decaled jacket with the words Contraceptive on the back then it would slap regardless of that orangutan's influence.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

irregardless

What a horrible word

[–] don@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems like it should mean “without regardlessness” or “having no regardlessness”, which is a bit of a complicated way of saying “with regard”. Synonymous with “unregardless”.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

What it should mean is something you should take up with those who write dictionaries.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think @finitebanjo@lemmy.world meant it as a "synonym" (it's not) to regardless

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

You're both incorrect, sorry to say. Try a dictionary out some time.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Can't be a sovcit -- there's no gold fringe on that shirt.