this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
235 points (90.9% liked)

Political Memes

1642 readers
133 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“Not all jewish people are Israelis so it would be anti-semitic to start hating random jews over this. It’s correlation not causation.”

“Yes, that makes sense and is fair. However, I can say that Israel as a country is being pretty fucking awful and since they’re separate things then I should be able to criticise one while leaving the other out of it.”

“No, now you’re being anti-semitic.”

It’s like, pick one.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago

Never believe that Zionists are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The Zionists have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

  • Jean-Paul Sartre

Amazing how it's still 100% accurate

[–] Linktank 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They aren't conversing in good faith, and continuing to have discourse with them is a waste of time.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

sometimes it’s worth calling them out on their deceptive arguments… but anything past that is a waste of time.

[–] Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

See 6 hour Hasan v Ethan Klein video for reference

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

that would be a waste of time

[–] Meltdown@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The whole claim to having a "right" to exist on conquered land is kind of a weird one, philosophically.

If it's legitimate to acquire territory through conquest, then there's no debate that the land belongs to the Palestinians. But, consequently, if conquest is a legitimate means of acquiring territory, then the Israelis are not doing anything different in acquiring the land than the Muslims did when they first conquered Palestine and established their colony there.

On the other hand, maybe conquest is not a legitimate means of acquiring territory and the Israelis are in the wrong for trying to gain land that way. But if that's true, that conquest is not a legitimate means of acquiring territory, then the Muslim conquerors who took Palestine in the first place were also in the wrong and their claim to the territory is similarly illegitimate.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 17 hours ago

Lot of mental gymnastic there. The ottoman no longer rule the land. Israel is the current occupier of palestinians. Palestinians are decendent of the cananites and was arabized they are not colonizers like you claim

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

That's a hot take, I'm interested to see how that works out for you.

I always debate with myself whether it's worthwhile to weigh in on these things because no matter what opinion you have there's a group of very opinionated people who will disagree with you, despite not being involved in the conflict and having no personal stake in the outcome.

All I'll say on the matter is: are we not passed the point of killing eachother for land/resources? No? Alright then.

[–] DtA@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wow you are missing a lot of history, over a dozen civilizations had that land before the Palestinians. Why does it not belong to them?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Before the Palestinians? Who do you think Palestinians are? Do you think they're a new group of people that took the land recently? Different groups of come into conquer the region but the residents were still them. That's how migration waves work. Especially in this region considering mostly it's not people settling in the area it's just people ruling the area from afar. Hell they are a Semitic people.

[–] DtA@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Palestine

None of your points are true, maybe read some history first.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You honestly think the residents of the area were entirely purged every time a new power conquered the land?

[–] DtA@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the crusades where they just asked Muslims nicely to become catholic, without murdering most of them. At one point palestine was majority catholic.

Or the ottomans, known for their hospitality.

[–] Meltdown@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's precisely the point. If the Palestinians have the right to the land because they were the most recent conquerors, then what happens when the next conquerer comes, claiming the same right of conquest?

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Palestinians was colonized by many civilization including the ottoman and now israel. Palestinians are not conquerors