this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
2172 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

7681 readers
1698 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EySkibidiBabBab@feddit.dk 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A living edge case. I love it.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

I guess the only solution is to free the nipple

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (39 children)

Is it illegal for women to be topless?

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 150 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It would have been icing on the cake if trans men would have been in the same protest, also topless, but they weren't censored lol

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To many in alt right groups, trans men don't exist.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, cis dudes would work in that context too, no?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago

Not if the point is to make the government acknowledge their gender.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 378 points 2 days ago (9 children)

SOMETIMES A CHECKMATE IS JUST SO FUCKING POETIC.

Butters: weiners out!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 146 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For real, this is such a great move. Oh sure, the government could just ban nipples in general, but good luck enforcing that when it gets mildly warm and every scottish man rips their shirt off

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Maximumbird@lemm.ee 59 points 1 day ago

Fucking Genius

[–] wolfrasin@lemm.ee 169 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Legendary behavior. Bigots can choke on it

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

A lot of them do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 94 points 1 day ago

Malicious compliance at its best.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call a brilliant catch-22 situation.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 196 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Another example of the Scots fighting for freedom .... they've been doing it successfully for thousands of years and they're still doing it!

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

They are a fraction of the population yet the majority causes them immeasurable harm simply because they exist. The louder they persecute, the more prominent LGBTQ+ movement becomes .... it's contradictory. If conservatives had just left them alone, there would almost be no issue about any of this at all.

There are far more important debates and fights to be had in our society .... namely the fight to preserve the survivability of our species in the coming centuries ... yet here we are fighting about who gets to show or not show their tits!!!!

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 96 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Conservatives need a demographic to hate. This one is perfect because they will never be Conservatives, and most hardcore Conservatives can't stand to see homosexual PDA.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 70 points 1 day ago

Damn, these people are bold as fuck. Get it!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

In America most men are overweight or obese and have pendulous lumps on their chests with nipples attached. Personally I don't love seeing them, but when the weather is right, they are all over the goddamn place. It's absolutely ludicrous that women can't do the same. If there were any logical rule it would be don't show your chesticles unless you are a woman who uses them for feeding a child OR everybody gets to have their tits out regardless of any gender types. Pick one and go with it, but the current laws are base AF.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When I was in pre-K, on a really hot day, I remember asking why the boys got to take off their shirts but I couldn’t.

Now that I’ve had top surgery, I can be the fat hairy bearded guy that mows lawns shirtless. It’s nice.

[–] PagPag@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I mow with a long sleeve that’s rated for 15spf, skin cancer is a real concern. Stay safe out there fam

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The safety vs comfort rivalry

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 day ago

Austin actually has a city ordinance with more or less this exact logic. Once you’ve seen a dozen or so average women with their chests uncovered at the pool, it loses any excitement it may have initially held.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other parts of the world nudity isn't seen as a big deal or in some cases even unusual in certain settings. Americans are so afraid of seeing a titty or penis or whatever else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot imagine being a cop in this country the laws are just totally arbitrary and you'd have to enforce them even though they make zero sense.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It gets even mader. If you take one step over the border into England, being topless suddenly becomes legal regardless of gender or birth sex.

however it is not an offence for a man or a woman to be topless in England and Wales, so long as the person has not taken off their clothes with the intention of shocking or upsetting others.

https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/616538

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 2 points 20 hours ago

Does this mean you can stand on the south side of hadrians wall and wave your titties at the Scots without legal repercussions?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is even a special ordinances for Newcastle that say that the moment the temperature exceeds 12°C taking your top off becomes mandatory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

UK Supreme Court:

"We now rule that while men and women are allowed to be topless, this doesn't apply to trans women. Trans women, and only trans women, can be tried for being topless."

[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 138 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Tits censored, guess they are women then. Fuck the transphobes

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

Took me a while to even notice they are censored, and not just weird looking

[–] Sausa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Katy Montgomerie a really good interview with one of the women at the protest: https://youtu.be/wbA0q0eqYnM

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 100 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Biological women can do it too if they print and cut out pics of men nipples and stick them on top.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

actually proud of Scotland for once, not the government but the people

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's the UK supreme court, not a Scottish court, that decided to stomp over all the progress we had made with trans rights.

The Scottish Parliament tends to be considerably more left wing than the UK Parliament. Left to their own devices they would probably be much more like a Scandinavian country.

But actually, yes, the Scottish people are indeed awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Love the message, but the blurb isn't correct. Police couldn't not arrest them because it would define them as a woman, outraging public decency and similar laws don't require specific genders.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›