this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
543 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3182 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Nick Clegg, former Meta executive and UK Deputy Prime Minister, has reiterated a familiar line when it comes to AI and artist consent.
  • He said that any push for consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.
  • Clegg added that the sheer volume of data that AI is trained on makes it “implausible” to ask for consent.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Let's hope it does.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago
[–] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago
[–] aaron@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And not asking for it will kill whatever remains of the creative industries.

What do you want, a few years of ai slop followed by the more or less rapid decline of the internet (as it is overwhelmed with model collapse creative works and untrustable content) that will afford the likes of Clegg (in his role of 'meta' executive) a huge payout, or creative people having any hope of a sustained ability to make a living?

I know what I would prefer and I also know what is most likely going to happen. This is the result of decades of neo-liberal fossil-fuel-powered capitalism.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

So… what’s the down side to this bill?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If asking for permission is going to kill an industry, then that industry should be killed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 week ago

[tardigrade_violin.jpg]

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man on Wall Street; it belongs to the shareholders.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of ALL the brows?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt it. With that $500 billion dollar grant, you can hire people to make art to train on. That's a LOT of money.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What makes you think that they'd do that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

file under: “unsurprising capitalist takes”

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s implausible that I would pay for Netflix, Disney+, Paramount+, etc.

When I can just build a server and buy a VPN connection.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Makes sense. Paying for all those services would kill my ability to support other industries. Fair game.

load more comments (2 replies)

Is this going in for a vote? Where do I vote?

Yay, kill it please.

Come on Disney! Use your god tier copyright lawyers and stop this AI shit for good.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Ah, if it isn’t my old friend Mr. Nick Clegg, with a dick for a face and an ass for a head!

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ha... He was the Lib Dem poster boy for a good decade. And they're something akin to pro-business libertarians. I wonder what Lib Dem Dep PM Clegg would have said to this!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He was the poster boy because he managed to rise to the rank of completely irrelevant, the highest level of office any lib dem has ever achieved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

He admit it!

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Honestly not a bad thing, I mean you're not going to OpenSource your AI so this is a good alternative

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yes please.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›