Then it should die.
This is like saying "if we had to ask for consent, the human race would die." Fucking creepy, rapist vibes.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Then it should die.
This is like saying "if we had to ask for consent, the human race would die." Fucking creepy, rapist vibes.
Cool, so I'll get started on building an automated business that sells cheap access to all the music, movies and shows on the streaming services.
Getting consent for each title would basically kill my business and would be implausible, so I'll just assume it's ok.
If a business cannot survive without breaking the law, then it is not a business but a criminal organisation.
I have a proposition. Raid them with police and search their computers for stolen data like you would do with your citizens.
oh noes
Look, these goddamn assholes have got in their head that they have a right to profit.
NOBODY HAS A RIGHT TO PROFIT.
You have a right to try to create a profit and there are rules to that. You're gonna lose your billions in investment if you can't plaigerize content?....fuck you, your loss, and you shoulda fucking known better when the idea was presented to you.
Assholes
If being declined concent is going to kill your industry then maybe your industry deserved to die.
Fucking rapist mentaility right there.
My thought exactly. If consent isn't needed, what other actions do they deem justified without consent?
This is not a IP-issue, this is about human rights.
I'm ok with "ai" dying
Great, let's do that.
Same thing for most of billionaires' income sources.
"Respecting [insert human right] would kill [insert industry]."
If asking for permission is going to kill an industry, then that industry should be killed.
So I can steal all their shit too, right? It would "Implausible" for me to do so.
correction: will kill people's attempts to make billions out of other people's art. Otherwise inquisitive people will continue to do non-profit research this way or another.
Actually here is a question to you: Would you be ok if the law stated you don't need permission if it is non-profit and open source? Yea I thought so bitch.
Kill the AI industry? Sweet. As an artist I do not consent.
Good.
Good.
Oh, so it'd be ok to get movies, pictures, books, etc. without asking the right owners for us too? GREAT.
And not asking for it will kill whatever remains of the creative industries.
What do you want, a few years of ai slop followed by the more or less rapid decline of the internet (as it is overwhelmed with model collapse creative works and untrustable content) that will afford the likes of Clegg (in his role of 'meta' executive) a huge payout, or creative people having any hope of a sustained ability to make a living?
I know what I would prefer and I also know what is most likely going to happen. This is the result of decades of neo-liberal fossil-fuel-powered capitalism.
So… what’s the down side to this bill?
Let's hope it does.
Is this going in for a vote? Where do I vote?
Honestly not a bad thing, I mean you're not going to OpenSource your AI so this is a good alternative
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man on Wall Street; it belongs to the shareholders.
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of ALL the brows?
If an industry can't survive without resorting to copyright theft then maybe it's not a viable business.
Imagine the business that could exist if only they didn't have to pay copyright holders. What makes the AI industry any different or more special?
He admit it!
Yay, kill it please.
Ah, if it isn’t my old friend Mr. Nick Clegg, with a dick for a face and an ass for a head!
Fine then, kill it.
Well let's hope it will.