this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

State Level DOGE Inspired Task Forces Watchlist

107 readers
1 users here now

As of 2025 state and county level task forces begun popping up across the United States. While some have picked less conspicuous official names such as “Red Tape Relief Project” and “Fiscal Responsibility Program,” all were announced as “DOGE-inspired.”

There is 100% a reason a gigantic shadow network of wealthy individuals linked to the heritage foundation is quietly pushing policies at state levels across the country while hiding behind claims of small government and transparency.

By the time the federal government completely collapses they will have everything in place to start over with their new network of support built and ready to go: New laws, new military forces, a new secret police (DOGE task forces), and a new America created to protect the interests of the wealthiest individuals and corporations on the planet. This has been in the works for decades, and even if we can't stop them, we should not be quiet about this, and we should definitely not be making things any easier on them. When you see something, make some noise and help me call this shit out!

Current list of state task forces that are constantly growing:

•Florida

•Georgia

•Iowa

•Kansas

•Kentucky

•Louisiana (Fiscal Responsibility Program)

•Missouri

•Montana (Red Tape Relief Project)

•New Hampshire

•North Carolina

•North Dakota

•Oklahoma

•South Carolina

•Tennessee (State level and at least one county level in Hamilton County)

•Texas

•Wisconsin

This is a place to report or discuss any news related to these groups or for news and discussion of any corruption going on at smaller levels. Even outside of the United States. If you have an example of smaller level corruption that needs to be called out, drop it here.

Rules:

Be respectful

No abusive language

No bigotry

No ads

No porn

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, a candidate or elected official could use their campaign and PAC money to help pay off a portion of their home mortgage, as long as part of the property was used for campaign purposes and the candidate charged his campaign “fair market value,” under one provision of the legislation. 

The bill was largely written by two private attorneys who work for Gov. Jeff Landry and represented him in multiple legal disputes he has with the ethics board.

Most recently, lawyers Stephen Gelé and Charles Spies are working for Landry as the governor faces ethics charges for failing to disclose flights he took on a political donor’s plane in 2021. But Wright’s legislation would not affect the outcome of that case against Landry. 

Wright said his legislation is also meant to address frustrations elected officials have with ethics board fines and investigations into their spending.

What would be allowed

Should it pass, Wright’s legislation would explicitly let political candidates, elected officials and their PACs spend money on a long list of new services and expenses that aren’t laid out in the current law.

These proposed allowable expenses would include:

*Paying lobbyists at the State Capitol and in Washington D.C.

  • Paying for an elected official or candidate’s spouse and children to accompany them to Washington Mardi Gras, a national political convention or any professional conference attended as an elected official.

*Covering any fines or penalties the ethics board has levied against a person for violating campaign finance or ethics laws.

  • Paying for security measures such as cameras and fences to be installed in order to protect a candidate or elected official, including at their personal residence or office.

*Payments on a personal or business loan, including a home mortgage, on property owned by the candidate as long as the candidate is using a portion of that property for campaign purposes and is charging his campaign “fair market” value. For example, this could include storing campaign signs in the garage of an elected official’s house and then charging the campaign the market rate of a local storage locker.

*Paying dues, fees and gratuities to a social organization such as a country club, fitness center, Mardi Gras krewe or any other “nonpolitical organization” as long as the membership “facilitates” interaction with a constituent, another elected official or a former elected official.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here