this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1110 readers
14 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Wasn't Nixon forced to resign for having people break into a congressional office. Now it's just another Tuesday?

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This story is such fascist bullshit to read.

Germany in the 1940s “Open up! You’re harboring Jews!”

America in 2025, “Open up! You’re harboring political enemies!”

These people expedite the erosion of law. When federal agents don’t follow the law & the injustice is obvious, it’ll turn into anarchy, which is followed by a ‘justified’ police state / Marshall law. We’re no better than our enemies. We used to care about the optics, but now even that is dropped.

So disappointed by this country.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So I guess the question is: Did they need a warrant? Who's property is that? IMO it's property of the legislative branch, so the executive should have a warrant. Not sure what the law says though.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

Ownership might be complicated. Its a legislative office that's leased from a courthouse.

They surely needed a warrant since they were not in hot pursuit of a criminal; hence the need to fabricate a story about rioters.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sir, this is the gift articles community.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

No worries. Here on, I'll just read the archived version and leave others to accept nyt 3rd party cookies or not.