this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

World News

22 readers
636 users here now

!usa@ponder.cat

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

In The Political Economy of Human Rights, Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman argued that the American ruling class and corporate media regard bloodbaths as being constructive, nefarious or benign. A constructive bloodbath is typically carried out by the US or one of its proxies, and is endorsed in establishment media. The most obvious contemporary example is the genocidal US/Israeli campaign in Gaza, approved by media commentators in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post.

The two other approaches that Chomsky and Herman outline illuminate the corporate media’s approach to Syria. When Bashar al-Assad was in power in Syria and the US was seeking his overthrow, corporate media treated killings that his government and its allies carried out as nefarious bloodbaths: Their violence was denounced in corporate press with unambiguous language, and prompted demands that the US intervene against them.

In the months since Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa came to power, with substantial assistance from the US and its partners, his government has opened Syria’s economy to international capital, arrested Palestinian resistance fighters, indicated that it’s open to the prospect of normalizing relations with Israel, and opted not to defend Syria against Israel’s frequent bombings and ever-expanding occupation of Syrian land. In that context, Washington has embraced Damascus, with Trump praising al-Sharaa personally, and finally lifting the brutal sanctions regime on Syria.

As these developments have unfolded, US media have switched from treating bloodbaths in Syria as nefarious to treating them as benign. A benign bloodbath is one to which corporate media are largely indifferent. They may not openly cheer such killings, but the atrocities get minimal attention, and don’t elicit high-volume denunciations. There are few if any calls for perpetrators to be brought to justice or ousted from government.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Amnesty International is a Western Imperialist Mouthpiece"

"The US was the driving force of Syrian sectarianism before the civil war!"

"The total indifference of Western media towards Assad's killings from 2015-2024 are something I've completely forgotten!"

And other greatest hits of International Politics As Counterculture.

[–] PlasticLove 0 points 2 days ago

Sounds more like a puppet state.