this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
82 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
4531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta says blame should fall on appstores. What willl be next, web browsers? or search engines ??

will search engines have to vett people age to use Facebook too?

edit: i'm changing the news article to one with no pay wall. went from Washingtonpost to the hill

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vetting of the app downloads should fall on the app stores.

Vetting of the platform usage should fall on the platform owners.

The app isn't the problem any more than a web browser is - it's a dumb front-end for the platform. The platform is the problem.

[–] burtek@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta trying to blame and put responsibility on someone else? That's a first 🙃

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For sure, but it's worth calling out.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

… parents? Maybe blame them?

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My friend has parental controls for her kids cellphone. She can limit her kids usage of apps.

[–] Zerfallen@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

She also limits their use of the web browser app, where they could sign into Facebook?

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No no no, is the platforms fault 🤦‍♂️

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Should fall on the profile settings, which would then reflect on the app store, or basically exactly how it is right now. Could also be done client side and then the app store inheriting the client, whatever is more restrictive.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The proposal, which the Facebook and Instagram parent company is set to announce Wednesday, counters mounting calls by state and federal policymakers for individual sites to proactively screen kids to limit their use of social media platforms over safety concerns.

In recent years, lawmakers and children’s safety advocates have largely focused their attention on combating the damaging experiences of kids on social media apps such as Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.

Davis’s comments arrive as states take up sweeping new measures to restrict kids from accessing social media amid renewed concern that such products may compromise the mental health and well-being of younger users.

Federal lawmakers have proposed similar bills to create an age minimum for social media, citing concerns that the sites are contributing to teen mental health issues like anxiety and depression.

Meta has faced growing scrutiny in recent years over its efforts to protect kids, which reached new heights in 2021 after Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen disclosed internal research showing the company’s products at times worsened body image issues among teen girls.

In 2021, Meta ran a marketing campaign making the case that targeted advertising on the internet helped small businesses, following the phone-maker’s decision to cut down on the practice with new privacy rules.


The original article contains 828 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!