this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
20 points (91.7% liked)

Steam Deck

14899 readers
24 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi

After I update the SteamOS 3.5.5 , I want to update/install the flatpak packages with flatpak update -y. this command does not worked and I need sudo access for that. Is this become rule of thumb for flatpak packages for this update?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your screenshot gives no indication that it's a permission problem.

[–] dvdnet89 3 points 1 year ago

I checked it is a bug that cause conflict between distrobox and Flatpak. So, you have to pick Flatpak or distrobox. So, I need chose Flatpak and I need to delete the podman and distrobox is broken https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5104 https://www.reddit.com/r/SteamDeck/comments/16mwirf/flatpak_update_issue_in_35_preview_related_to/?sort=new

[–] Tau@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you tried with --user ?

[–] dvdnet89 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So, the right command is flatpak update -y --user ?

[–] Tau@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe. I usually update my flatpaks through Discover.

Though it looks like the problem is that it can't write to /tmp. Try using chmod a+wr /tmp and trying to flatpak update -y again

[–] Dr_Willis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't recall ever needing the --user option, if the command is ran by the user.

if you were running the command via sudo, then yes, you would want the --user option.

Understand that flatpaks can be installed system wide, or on a per user basis.

if you are not careful you can install the same flatpak system wide when you just wanted it installed by the one user.

I wasted a lot of disk space and time before I learned how flatpak works.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Flatpak without --user changes flatpaks system wide, irrespective with which user it's run. By using --user flatpak's are stored in the home directory (.local, I believe).

Most distros ship with system wide flatpak remotes, so --user isn't necessary.