this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
291 points (98.0% liked)

World News

47627 readers
2363 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 103 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I believe ALL of the following;

  • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
  • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
  • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
  • Israel should not genocide
  • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
  • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
  • Palestinians will remain fucked...if they survive.

My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others' greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Exactly. This is not a competition, we don’t have to cheer for either side. Horrible things are happening

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

My exact thoughts

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability" - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 35 points 2 days ago

But genocide against Palestinians is a-OK.

What does the "G" in G7 stand for? Gaslighting? Genocide? Grift? Maybe there are 7 Gs.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago

it also helps if your air defense network doesn't collapse immediately because it turns out that in order to guard these nukes you need also regular capable conventional military

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 48 points 2 days ago (25 children)

nobody should have nuclear weapons.

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if the scientists working on the Manhattan project had all agreed it's too much and intentionally sabotage every test.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It would have been discovered later on, perhaps by another power first.

We would still have all the atrocities that happened after Hiroshima and Nagasaki but people in the West would not suffer the anxiety that they could be possibly get hurt as well.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 days ago

Jesus fucking Christ. Fuck all of these assholes.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Why? If the West will allow Israel to live stream a genocide and both political parties in the US stick their fingers in their ears and make sounds like children, Iran has no choice but to pursue a nuke to defend itself.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I'm just surprised squeaky tank birthday pissboy didn't elbow his way to the center of this photo like he used to do during his first term. He must be tired from being old as fuck.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Iran will have nukes. They don't have a choice. Not anymore. It's existentialism at this point. Israel has been trying to engineer a war against Iran for more than 30 years. All the while Iran has played along. IAEA inspectors and all that good shit. And it was all for nothing. Iran knows that now. So does everyone else.

If you're an adversary to the US and its Imperial interests then its a matter of when, not if. Doesn't matter if or how closely you follow their rules. They will come for you in time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chebur54@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Decided bunch of criminals who brainwashed everyone with existence of the nukes. Legalize recreational nukes. Lol

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago (38 children)

Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.

Ok does someone want to catch me up on this opinion shared by world leaders but quite literally no one else?

Like yes, Iran is a terrible authoritarian state that is very dangerous. But so is Saudi Arabia?!

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well you see the existence of Iran forces Israel to bomb them, thus destabilizing the region. If Iran would simply stop existing, Israel wouldn't have to bomb them, and the region would be stable

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›