this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1265 points (96.0% liked)

Firefox

20793 readers
43 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aradia@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I don't know which websites do that browser discrimination.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

What's the problem with Firefox? Certainly can't be the speed or ram usage.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's no problem with Firefox. The problem is with managers of websites. Because Chromium-based browsers combined account for something like over 90% of global browser market share currently (source: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share), many sites decide to just throw any non-Chromium browser users overboard. The whole thing is quite ridiculous. It makes no sense that Firefox has such a low market share either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

it's too privacy focused, independent, and earnest at the moment

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is that the logo for Amarok?

[–] skeeter_dave@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

No librewolf, but I totally do see the Amarok confusion lol

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

Amarok is what converted me to Linux Desktop, especially the iPod support in 2008. For me that was the year of the Linux Desktop.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›