this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
246 points (99.2% liked)

Open Source

40231 readers
403 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Slyke@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cool. I noticed that it only mentions convicted, pending conviction, or other immigration violations. It doesn't mention those that have no issues? Or is that what other immigration violations are (like visa over stayers etc).

[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah that was my first thought too.

Haven't there been cases of legal US citizens being detained by ICE? Surely they wouldn't fit into any of those categories...

[–] Slyke@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Exactly. While the number is probably small relatively speaking, hiding it isn't a good look.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they have to be accused of something to be detained. Immigration violations of some types don't get a court hearing to be "convicted" of those violations by a judge by default.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they have to be accused of something to be detained.

Doesn't seem to be true anymore.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

No, it's still true. They are being accused of being brown in the USA. Or being a political rival. Remember, the government can accuse anyone of anything, due process sorts out if the accusations have merit... Oh wait.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

More usefull an FOSS tool to access and modify ICE data base.