78
Gaza war to continue for at least two more months, says Israel defence minister (timesofindia.indiatimes.com)
submitted 7 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

Two months is wildly optimistic.

US officials have spoken with their Israeli counterparts and found the Israelis have no long term plan. They’ll hit Gaza and then have no plan for after that. It won’t solve the longterm problems or make peace any easier. It’s just a Pyrrhic victory they’re going for by this point.

[-] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 26 points 7 months ago

The thousands killed and all of the destruction caused will ensure that Gazans will never accept peace. The raids, displacement and murders that were committed in the West bank while the world was distracted by Gaza, will ensure that the Palestinians of the West bank won't be very happy with their government that wants peace with the oppressors.

There you go, peace is harder to achieve. Victory.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

That's their whole point, the Israeli government does not want peace they want a nation with borders delineated by the talmud and the only way to get that is to ethnically cleanse everything within those borders.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

But they will use up a whole load of arsenal and buy a lot more. Money for arms dealers.

[-] livus@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They are also most likely testing an experimental weapon in Gaza judging by reports from medical staff there who are seeing a new type of injury.

[-] livus@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago
[-] Alivrah@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is horrible and disgusting, wtf

[-] livus@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

Yes, it's terrible. It also explains a lot - while culture and religion might be reasons for ordinary people to fight, their backers who make it possible usually have a financial incentive.

Specific reportage about the likely new experimental weapons in use right now is mostly from sources like Al Jazeera but the underlying practice has been well-established by western journalists too.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago

Still some Palestinian kids left, huh?

[-] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, need to leave a couple behind so they can send some fireworks over. Then Israel can go back in to mow the lawn.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

But there’s no exit strategy. What changes in two months?

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

A lot more dead civilians and uninhabited land for settling.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Then in two months Netanyahu is still in power. They did more genocide, then extend it another two months. Rinse and repeat until everyone living in Gaza is dead and then it's time to genocide the west bank

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 4 points 7 months ago

Lol wut? They've been at war for, what, 100 years?

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 0 points 7 months ago

Ya but this time they are gonna hunt down every Hamas out there. Mossad flat out even got called out to strike Hamas leadership in Qatar even.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 4 points 7 months ago

Are you joking? The more they do that, the more terrorists they create.

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 8 points 7 months ago

Sweet summer child, the more terrorists they create, the more valid their genocide and land grab appears.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's why their plan is genocide.

[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 months ago

Wars should be consensual. If one side doesn’t want war then that should be that. If the other pursues the world should stop ‘em. Kinda like same principle as rape. Like sex is great. Rape not so much.

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

There isn't many times when either side wants the war. They usually want something else and the war is the result of one side doing something and the other stopping them.

Everyone wants peace, every war is fought for peace. It's just the type of peace that causes war.

Israel doesn't want war, they want all of the people in Gaza gone. Gaza doesn't want war, they want Israelis gone. Both have a preference for peace, just not a peace both sides will agree to.

Of course some defense companies and those that seek violence want war. But nations and most people don't. Wars never great.

[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

I expect most Palestinians (i.e. not Hamas) would be happy with a one-state solution with equal rights for all regardless of religion or background. Even after all the history and injustice.

[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

When I said Gaza wants Israeli gone, it was probably an over simplification. They would probably be happy without the Israeli boot on their neck. If that's a one state or two state solution. Being recognised as citizens with rights is probably the desire of most Palestinians.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What Israel is doing isn't a war, it's a genocide. They aren't targeting militants, they're targeting civilians.

Even Hamas (the eeeevillll terrorists) have done more to minimize civilian casualties, something like 80% of the people they've killed were confirmed to be soldiers, the other 20% unconfirmed but fairly likely to have been combatants as well, or at a maximum accidental crossfire.

"But Israel said-" You don't think they miiight have been projecting a little when they said Hamas was out for civilian blood...?

[-] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Really? The 1500 people that Hamas killed in the attack were 80% soldiers? Or is that stat over the last few decades of conflict?

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 7 months ago

Seriously?

What nation goes: "Hey neighbor, you wanna kill a bunch of each other's soldiers and use a bunch of resources and pollute the earth? Maybe we can also kill some innocent babies while bombing hospitals for funsies?"

Wars are usually fought because one nation (or group) wants what the other has. If a side could get exactly what they want, there wouldn't be a war over it.

Wars are about taking: land, people, resources, revenge.

There's nothing consensual about it

[-] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This would indeed result in no more war, at all. I fail to see the problem. (Besides that it wouldn't work, of course -- but it's a nice fantasy.)

[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

That’s my point. My view is an international law about consent to war would be a good thing. Generally speaking, most countries deserve territorial sovereignty and shouldn’t have someone fucking around with them. I don’t think the “want what the other has” justifies wars. Corporations can do that well enough…

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 7 months ago

There are laws against breaking into people's houses, but it still happens. Just because someone proclaims something illegal doesn't mean it just stops happening. That's just not how the world works

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

This idea just begs the question of how exactly do you think international law works

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
78 points (95.3% liked)

World News

31456 readers
1364 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
jackmarxist@lemmy.ml
zephyreks@lemmy.ml
OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml