this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Economics

2106 readers
18 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a bit of synchronicity, we have two accounts that describe different aspects by which private equity limited partners, such as public pension funds like CalPERS, private pension funds, endowments, life insurers, and sovereign wealth funds are all cheerfully fleeced by private equity fund managers, which in the trade are called “general partners”. The Financial Times describes what ought to be a scam, continuation funds, which allow general partners to collect yet more fees on doggy old deals. Stanford Business sets forth the limited partners’ tender faith that general partners can generate alpha (return for investor skill) on a strategy that is leveraged equity in a very toppy stock market. Oh, and after many studies have demonstrated that to the extent private equity outperforms, the general partners harvest that through their fees and expenses, resulting in net returns to limited partners that more or less equate to stock market returns, but with higher risks.^1^

^1^ The evidence is so overwhelming that we hope you forgive us for not updating our tally from a 2020 post:

For the sake of completeness, here’s some of the extensive evidence from our archives that private equity not only doesn’t earn enough to compensate for its higher risk, but has even become merely an “on par with stocks” level investment:

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

At interesting thing this article didn't mention is the actual PVE procedure where the value of the company is calculated. turns out there are three different equations that are used, all come up with different answers. How do you choose which one you use? Based on the judge is that jurisdiction. As in, they don't really know. It's a vibe based system and this PE scam really looks like a Ponzi scheme

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Liberals breaking out the CaliPERS again