this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
910 points (96.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

25594 readers
1099 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Also for home network I don’t won’t my IOT to have a real IP to the Internet. Using IPv4 NAT you can have a bit of safety by obscurity

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago

NAT is not much different to a firewall though… just because the address space is publicly routable does not mean that the router has to provide a route to it, or a consistent route

NAT works by assigning a public port for the outgoing stream different to the internal port, and it does that by inspecting packets as they go over the wire: a private machine initiates a connection, assign an arbitrary free port, and sends that packet off to the router, who then reassigns a new port, and when packets come in on that port it looks up the IP and remapped port and substitutes them

that same process can easily be true in IPv6 but you don’t need to do any remapping: the private machine initiates a connection, and the router simply marks that IP and port combination as “routable” rather than having to do mappings as well

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know its a joke but man its annoying to go from something that is organized in a human readable way to one where you have to rely on the system. I am someone who hates databases though so I have always been like this. Heck way back in the aughts I used to complain that my job involved more seeing and issues and fixing it and the systems were getting to were I feel more like im counseling it.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I do like how I can easily remember IPv4 addresses while I struggle to remember a single IPv6 address

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

bro just add another octet to the end of ipv4. That goes from 4 billion to a trillion and will most definitely outlast modern electronics and capitalism

[–] Part4@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they must have thought: 'Well we thought four and a quarter billion was going to be enough. We don't want to repeat the mistake, so let's create an unimaginably large address space.'

Which, with the benefit of hindsight, now looks daft itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hi I have no idea what I’m doing when it comes to networking. I have ipv6 off on my home network because I was scared of accidentally exposing things outside of my home network. I’m using Ubiquiti. Can someone give me/link me a crash course on how to setup ipv6 without introducing any security holes into my network? Maybe also a crash course in firewalls.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Stream_Protocol

In case anyone wants to know what not to talk about.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›