Running

2533 readers

5 users here now

A place for runners.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 9 months ago by marvinfreeman@lemmy.world to c/running@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I didn't know there was all that much difference in shoe foams.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

IMO, foam just benefits those that heelstrike. Course, I'm a toe runner, so I'm in a totally different camp.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Is there not foam under the entire shoe? Is your heel not contacting the ground whatsoever during a given stride?

[–] python@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

Ballet strats

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Personally the moment I saw that a foam was described as "boring" I new this was bullshit opinion and not science

[–] TeXitoi@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

The best energy return, most durable, and cheaper is no shoes! Infinite value for money!