142
submitted 7 months ago by goat@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago

Why would that be something you have to defend? Maori is one of the official languages of the country.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 months ago

FTA

The three parties in the new coalition government last week signed agreements that outline policies to roll back the use of Maori language and require all government agencies to primarily use English for their department names and communications.

[-] stellargmite@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Destructive. The intention being to return to a perceived ‘status quo’ which was effectively a policy(more like ideology) of cultural annihilation. The behaviour of an authoritarian occupying force, rather than one of partnership. Stirring up the worst in our backwater colony while they prepare to fleece their credulous voters while dangling plastic carrots (oooh tax cuts).

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

I recognize that. It is still not something that needs to be defended. The bank is not governed by the same laws since they are independent. It is also an apolitical body so coalition politics don't really mean much.

But again, Maori is an official language so it is ridiculous for any government related organization to apologize for making statements in it regardless of policy.

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

What a bunch of creeps, and how unusual for a bank to defend something like that.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

It’s the reserve bank, so it’s a government entity for printing money etc.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Long story short, after the recent election we have a centre right, further right, and a populist party in a coalition government. It took them 6 weeks to finalise their coalition agreements and now they have stated their intend to roll back pretty much anything that the previous (centre-left, single party) government brought in.

However, use of Māori in the public service is not new, it has been around for decades. But recently some departments have started using their Māori name as their main name and the English name as a secondary name (instead of the other way around), so all the old white guys are confused and angry.

[-] BustlingChungus@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Damn, that’d suck if it goes ahead - as an Aussie who was very disappointed with the result of the recent referendum here, I really admire what NZ has done to integrate and champion Māori culture ☹️

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

You Aussies have a reputation for being horribly racist. We should revoke your independence and house train you all to be more civilised.

[-] BustlingChungus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

sadly I can’t disagree with you - that reputation is fairly earned. I, for one, welcome our new NZ overlords 😂

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WELLINGTON, Nov 29 (Reuters) - New Zealand’s central bank chief defended its use of the Maori language in official communications on Wednesday, as the country’s new centre-right government looks to roll back the use of the Indigenous language in the public sector.

Luxon said on Wednesday said the government would introduce legislation to reform the RBNZ's mandate and lift a ban on the sale of cigarettes to future generations within its first 100 days.

Over the past few years, the RBNZ has undergone an overhaul that puts the country's Maori heritage and language at the centre of its operations.

The makeover, driven by Orr, has resulted in some bold changes not only to its corporate branding but also its approach to policy and communication.

The government has not released specific details on the policies and it is unclear whether they would directly impact the central bank.

The RBNZ is independent but is issued with a remit by the finance minister that specifies matters that the government wants the bank to focus on, such as financial stability and prudential regulation.


The original article contains 369 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
142 points (98.6% liked)

World News

37319 readers
2551 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS