this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
16 points (90.0% liked)

Hacker News

3871 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Echoing the people in that thread: works fine with firefox

[–] KJ118@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Haven't had any issues.

[–] Ecksell@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Better question is: Can I block that crap via PiHole at the perimeter?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Youtube ads cannot be blocked at the DNS level for years.

[–] Bademantel@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sadly no. Considering how few people use dns blocking YouTube was weirdly aggressive about moving the ads to the same domain as the video content. It’s probably inconvenient for them but they wanted to make sure that the couple thousand people using dns to control ads didn’t get one over in them.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or they wanted to get ahead of it before people started selling premade PiHole boxes on Amazon

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

I think it's more because it's a very easy step if it's the same company serving both the content and the ads. Just serve both through the same domains and you can't use DNS to block one without blocking the other.

[–] alphacyberranger@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It works most of the time for me. I do keep updating the filter list in ubo but sometimes it still doesn't work and i end up with the pop up "Allow ads to play this video". I'm using Firefox btw.