this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
4 points (54.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3787 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/3239908

Despite the impressive growth in broad economic indicators like GDP and a reduction in unemployment, millions of Americans are grappling with an ongoing humanitarian crisis. The Democrats' touted economic recovery, often referred to as "Bidenomics," faces scrutiny as food insecurity reaches its highest level since Biden took office, and financial hardship in 2023 is worse than in the previous three years. While the initial aid measures helped alleviate the blow of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent failure to enact a robust social agenda and the termination of temporary aid programs have left many Americans struggling. The situation is compounded by the fact that the country's strong economic recovery has not translated into welfare for many, as financial distress increased significantly after the expiration of pandemic aid programs. This dichotomy between macroeconomic success and the reality on the ground has led to growing discontent, with recent polls reflecting low approval of Biden's economic leadership.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Food insecurity? That shit was greatly reduced with the expanded child tax credit and then both parties failed to continue it. It was a rare silver bullet that worked and our government, not one party, failed to make it permanent.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Don't both sides this. Democrats couldn't get it done. Republicans actively wanted it gone.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. No shit. The economy has been increasing rigged against the middle and working classes for 40+ years now. We went from single-income, blue collar homeowners to dual-income white collar renters. And now we're in the final stages where even the credit economy can no longer sustain our basic needs.

  2. Biden said that under him, essentially nothing would change. And nothing has. Hillary promised The similar philosophy of "incremental change". These old Democrats are simply out of touch. Anyone who doesn't treat the economy as a thing in CRISIS is not living in reality.

  3. The ONLY thing that's going to fix this is if millennials can grab control of the Democratic party from the Boomers. If we can get AOC or some other Bernie Sanders-esque politician to actually be the Democratic nominee, we can move this country to the left with the same vigor that the MAGAts moved it to the right.

  4. I've got to end on this note: don't let critiques of Bidenomics fool you into voting Republican. Biden is helping, but not nearly enough. Republicans are foaming at the mouth to make everything worse for the working and middle class. They tried to take away our healthcare. They tried to add RETROACTIVE interest to student loans. They are holding minimum wage at poverty levels. They cut food stamps. They want to gut social security.

So yeah. Biden bad. Republicans incalculably worse.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago