FTA:
The judge said “there’s no way I’m going to grant that.”
"We're going to consider everything."
"BUT JUDGE THAT"S PREJUDICIAL TO OUR CASE!"
"That's why we're considering it. Dipshit."
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
FTA:
The judge said “there’s no way I’m going to grant that.”
"We're going to consider everything."
"BUT JUDGE THAT"S PREJUDICIAL TO OUR CASE!"
"That's why we're considering it. Dipshit."
Its like watching Liar Liar play out in real life.
It's like when you are presenting random evidence in Ace Attorney because you have no fucking idea what's going on, except the judge isn't legally allowed to just throw his hands up and say "fuck it, guilty" after you fail five times
It's ~~pre~~judicial to their case.
Are Trump’s lawyers just doing stand-up now?
Always have been.
I think it's just repeats.
Ripbozo
The verdict is Trump is a Fraud and a Cheat
Trump ordered them to and they did so. That's about it.
Can anyone enlighten a legal-dummy about what the most likely outcome is? Like what can we honestly expect to happen, not just best case scenario. I just don't see a world where this dude actually faces punishment, right?
Can anyone predict the future?
Anyone claiming they can shouldn't be trusted.
Well, there can't be infinite possibilities, I'm assuming? Just sort of wondering if anyone could comment on what they thought the most likely outcome might be.
Is that really asking someone to predict the future?