this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
276 points (96.9% liked)

Today I Learned

17686 readers
1314 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 99 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tweets were on twitter.

On X it's called x-crements.

[–] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago

X-eets and x-itter.

Use the Chinese pronunciation

[–] AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somebody tell him to use Mastodon

[–] Liska@feddit.de 98 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, the German government was one of the first public entities adopting Mastodon as a secondary communication channel when shit hit the fan with regard to Musk and Twitter:

Here is their official Mastodon account!

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's the account of the Federal Government. The Kanzler himself still has his official account on X and has none on Mastodon.

[–] Liska@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's unfortunately correct - hopefully their instance / server gets broader adoption by cabinet members in the future, but for the moment I consider it a good start...

[–] AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's really cool 😎 ! today I learned something new

[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 50 points 1 year ago

Smart. Smarter would be not using X, but a lot of people still use X.

[–] unsaid0415@szmer.info 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why go through the hassle? EDIT: I mean as in "Just stop using X"

[–] Spike@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What do you mean? Because everybody should be able to read what the chancellor writes.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess the question if why don't they directly publish the content on the website without going through Twitter

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because people may want to express their opinion on what the chancellor says

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh sure, a platform that basically no one knows compared to twitter

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

All platforms started somewhere.

If the German government were to make an official announcement that they are switching to https://social.bund.de/ on the television, most of the interested German people would open an account overnight.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Yet another reason to serve this as a static content instead of using Twitter!

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. If someone sends me a twitter link, even if public, I can't read it as my privacy settings are such that they can't get a unique ID on me. It forces a log in. Which I can't, and won't do.

My colleague can view public tweets, even if not logged in, as we assume Twitter can uniquely identify them, even if not logged in.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They've stopped forcing a log in entirely, usually you can view the post that's linked just not any subsequent posts (which of course still ruins post threads, where the user spreads a single post over multiple entries).

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or just use a different platform? Other large public entities have, like the BBC, CBC etc.

[–] UESPA_Sputnik@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oddly enough there is a mastodon instance run by a German federal agency: https://social.bund.de/

No idea why the chancellor doesn't use it.

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My guess would be because of the reach? Like, Twitter has a lot of users and a lot of important figures in politics worldwide use it. Not that many people, both as in political figures, and small users use the Fediverse.

But then again, you could just do both.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

What reach? He literally needs to repost them elsewhere so people can read them freely.

[–] UESPA_Sputnik@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

My guess would be because of the reach?

I use neither Mastodon nor Twitter (I've never understood the value of microblogging) but one of them is freely available, the other one is restricted. In my view – as someone who has no account on either platform and only occasionally goes there if it's linked somewhere – Mastodon has a much wider reach.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully when twitterx goes extinct the German Chancellor will just spin up their own instance and federate their content.

[–] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I was researching a fire the other day for work, just wanted to verify basic facts. Local FD posted incidents on Twitter. Nope. Couldn’t manage to view it. That’s bullshit. They absolutely should not use it for that reason and to boot helping a megalomaniac make money.

[–] Anders429@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Why not just post on his website directly

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

With how reliant governments are on privately owned social media platforms I sometimes feel some open source social media platform should be run as a public utility so that public communications are at the mercy of wealthy megalomaniacs though I don't know how that would work in practice.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

If only there was an open source alternative...

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 9 points 1 year ago

It is a closed system. I tried to look at a company's news the other day, they post it on twitter/X/musk-vanity-project.com. If you're not logged in, you cannot (as far as I can work out) get tweets in chronological order any more. They DO have tweets made in the last few months. But I'm seeing 2019/2020 for pages and pages.

If you're not a user, that site is entirely useless now. Better to just wait for businesses to realise this and GTFO to a proper website. Not this Mickey Mouse toy of Musk's.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

He probably scans his faxes as well

[–] sab@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure the Germans in the thread are scratching their heads at this comment wondering what's wrong with scanning faxes.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Right. Why write something so obvious? "Oh, he probably breathes air as well." Look, I can do that too.

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

and print it out later for the archive

Imagine getting paid to do that.

[–] lord_lelek@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You wouldn't print a tweet.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.my.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"you wouldn't download oil/gas"

[–] BobbyBandwidth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You wouldn’t photocopy a fern (it would likely damage its delicate fronds)

[–] lord_lelek@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Jan Böhmermann, how dare you?