this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
60 points (87.5% liked)

World News

32146 readers
944 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chup@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would not call that a U-turn:

Instead, the government pledges to meet the 2 percent target on average over a five-year period, as already set out in the recently published National Security Strategy.

Seems more like the same direction, just on a parallel lane.

On the one hand debatable, as it doesn't come 100% in line with the wording of the NATO guideline. On the other hand a practical course to measure across 5 years, as in some years there are larger procurements required than in others and overall the 2% are still met.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Politico = Axel Springer
They always put a divisive spin on it. It's the German equivalent of Murdoch.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Atlantik-Brücke much?

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's going on in Germany regarding war and the army? It seems that when it comes to Ukraine help, EU defense or its own army you get an info one day and retract a few days later.

[–] statist43@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article is from a bullshit magazine, its actually 2% over 5 years, so not a real change

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, this just allows them to spend more in some year and less in another instead of having to budget to a very specific point each year.

[–] ebenixo@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago

The authoritarian pro military industrial complex block on lemmy is obviously not happy about this