this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
426 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2588 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 94 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Must be fun putting high explosives in a cannon and not knowing what will happen when you fire it.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Biblically-accurate Russian roulette?

[–] Skua@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Roulette" is French for "little wheel", so I suppose this is Russian roue

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Surely it's roule? (No I'm not gonna look it up because it's more fun to guess.)

[–] Skua@kbin.social 26 points 10 months ago

French cares not for your petty expectations of consistency

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Every french speaker knows that the end of the word is not. Important

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

And they sure are roueing the day!

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 47 points 10 months ago

Rare North Korea W

[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 35 points 10 months ago

Heartbreaking! The worst government you know just did something great, by accident.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Who though that North Korea would be on Ukraine's side?

[–] PauloPelle@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

With friends like these who needs enemies

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

... S Korea should start supplying large amounts of artillery ammo to Ukraine. It could be a proxy for the Korean War.

I imagine their shells are of much higher quality too.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Actually, South Korea has provided shells to Ukraine, but I doubt it is a proxy for anything.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True. They have a lot more though. Most countries haven't invested heavily in their 155 mm. S Korea, with all their artillery pointed across the DMZ for decades now, is an exception.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I was reading that Japan is sending Patriot missiles and arty shells that they have manufactured to the US. The US can then ship them on to Ukraine. Japanese law forbids sending weapons directly into a war.

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago

But a lot of people sees it that way. The war in Ukraine is proxy war between democratic countries versus authoritarian ones after all.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 10 months ago

You love to see it

[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

It would be even better if these were shell that were originally sold by russia/USSR to North Korea.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

russia army so stronk it can defeat itself!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago

It hurt itself in its confusion.

[–] 50gp@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

pretty expected that they would get whatever deals they wanted from russians and then provide them with shit in return

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

NK trolling Russia

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Russia is using low-quality artillery shells from North Korea that are often defective and cause problems on the front lines, Ukraine's army said.

It is particularly a problem in the "Dnepr" grouping of forces operating around the southern Kherson region under the command of Col. Gen. Mikhail Teplinsky, according to Ukraine's army.

Defense expert Trevor Taylor from the London-based Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies previously told Politico that it was unclear whether the North Korean ammunition was of a reliable quality.

Meanwhile, fears are also growing of a Ukrainian shell famine as Western military aid shows signs of faltering.

During its counteroffensive in the summer, Ukrainian forces were burning through artillery shells at a rate of about 7,000 rounds a day, according to figures from Estonia's defense ministry.

Israel's war with Hamas could also divert tens of thousands of artillery rounds intended for Ukraine, Axios reported in October.


The original article contains 329 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Dear leader, well done!

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These comment sections are beginning to look just like /r/worldnews.

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

dprk coming in clutch

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

How would Ukraine know this??? Are they inspecting exploded shells and determining it to be north Korean? If so, how? And why actually? Why would they inspect backfired explosives that belonged to the enemy?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's called military intelligence, and yes of course that's what Ukraine does. Knowing how your enemy is armed and what specific advantages and weaknesses their equipment has can literally help to win a war. They'd be stupid not to inspect any remnants.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

Ukraine also engages in a fair amount of propaganda (so much so that US and UK intelligence regularly contradict them), so asking for evidence isn't too unreasonable.

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

However, bear in mind two things.

  1. Military intelligence is not fool proof. It is still subject to inaccuracy and counterintelligence. UK airforce thought Nazi Germany's Luftwaffe outnumber them during the Battle of Britain, but it turned out to be the opposite. Similarly, US thought the Soviet Union has outsizedly more nuclear weapons, but it turned out it is the other way around. The Soviets in World War II had also been exemplary with feeding misinformation to the Germans.

  2. The Ukrainian military is still an organ of the Ukrainian government, who still has intention to keep morale up of their own people while undermining the enemy's. This is propaganda war as much as military one. After all, Kyiv admitted to having lied about the "Ghost of Kyiv" fighter ace pilot who supposedly shot down several Russian planes in the early days of the invasion. People cheered on that myth until confirmed to be untrue.

I'm not trying to undermine Ukraine's claim or effort and sow complete mistrust on Ukraine in their struggle, but I would reserve skepticism every now and then when any belligerent nations make extraordinary claims which require extraordinary evidence. Truth is the first casualty of war after all.

[–] TheUncannyObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The same way we know what people close to Putin are saying. Spies. Turns out, you offer people a little money, and many of them are more than happy to tell you anything you want to know. They did a test in New York once and found people were willing to give up corporate secrets for a bit of chocolate.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Oh shit, this makes more sense. I was very confused lmao