373
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Waldowal@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

Filter to 1-star and note how many reviews are direct copies of each other - many referencing that the Obamas are executive producers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 145 points 6 months ago

from the copy and pasted review:

Situations like these would bring you together, not force you apart.

Did any of these assholes pay attention to their own behavior during the pandemic?

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 70 points 6 months ago

People's behavior during the pandemic is why I'm absolutely sure there will never be another civil war.

What are these idiots going to do when they find their first empty grocery store?

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 41 points 6 months ago

Rob their neighbors, while armed.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Basically the American Dream.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 6 months ago

They think they're going to go hunting in the woods. But they forget that even if they do manage to catch something they don't have any way of preparing it or cooking it without taking it back to civilization. They think gas just turns up in stoves and electricity in wires.

They would probably fall apart long before that though, all national guard would need to do would be to turn off the internet in that area, and they'd be stuck. They have no way of organizing themselves except on social media less than one in 100 of them will own and know how to operate a AM radio.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 11 points 6 months ago

I kinda figured that’s why some of Meal Team 6 is kept around in reserve.

[-] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago

They were too busy snorting toilet paper and getting relief loans.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 69 points 6 months ago

that's all the maga and far right do.. parrot each other ad infinitum

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Correct, because they are incapable of actually thinking for themselves.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

If they could, they wouldn't be conservatives.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 68 points 6 months ago

Thanks Obama

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 59 points 6 months ago

Not even knowing that the Obamas had anything to do with it (like it matters at all?), I thought I was a refreshingly well-done movie in a genre I enjoy. Haters gonna hate.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

I'd give it a 7/10. Didn't blow my mind but it was entertaining.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago

I never heard about this movie before. Now I know it's a post-apocalyptic movie (love those) made by Sam Esmail (he did Mr. Robot, which was terrific). I guess it also happened to be produced by the Obamas.

So congratulations, reviewers. You got me interested in seeing a movie I didn't even know existed.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

i don't like that a former president is producing a postapoc movie with the way the world is going right now. does he know something we don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 54 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

For a few years now, I've purposely sought out movies and TV shows on RT and Metacritic with very high critic ratings, and super low user ratings.

The only time this really happens is if reviews are brigaded. If the user reviews were honest, it's pretty rare that you'd see more than 20-30% difference between critic and user score (MAX). So when you see a critic score of 95%, and user score of 1.8/10, then I know I'm in for a good time. Same with games to a lesser degree.

I'm not even kidding, this is almost always a sure way to find a film or show I enjoy. In fact, I wish they'd introduce a "Controversial" category with things that have a big gap between critic and user scores (though when it goes the other way, that is high user score to super poor critic reviews, it's almost always PureFlix-style Christian propaganda garbage).

[-] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Can you give some examples? I'd love to discover some gems.

Word of warning - I usually find that movies on rotten tomatoes with low critic scores and high audience scores are hitting the midweek sweet spot for me. Low cerebral requirement, high distraction. If you get me.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I've found the same thing, critic scores are harder to use as predictors because there is too much variance between their individual special opinions about the importance of character development vs the average user enjoying a movie for what it is. Obviously crap is crap, but a 56% critic and 82% user score is usually more appealing than vice versa

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Rotten tomatoes doesn't get the average of all critics scores, they only look whether or not the review was positive or negative. It doesn't look at their individual special opinions.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] teh_bishop@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

This timeline is full of morons and faildogs. Hate it.

[-] ersatz@infosec.pub 32 points 6 months ago

Netflix doesn't give a single shit about online reviews. All they care about is if people are watching it. And the numbers are really good from what I read. But I guess the anti-woke brigade needs to do something to feel like they're relevant.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

I don't think Netflix cares if you're watching it, as long as you pay your subscription they are happy, and if you don't watch anything it's even better!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 months ago

Holy deranged

Don't even consider watching this movie!!!!! Horrible movie. If I could leave zero stars I would. I would say the Obama’s should stick to politics but unfortunately I can’t say that either. Regardless, this review sums it up very well: Zero stars needs to be an option. One reviewer posted an excellent review of this movie, so I had to copy and paste. "If you care about using your time wisely, then avoid this film like the plague. But if you like watching terribly written media, then by all means grab a snack and relax. Because this film is the embodiment of utter garbage. The first, and to me, the greatest red flag is seeing the Obamas as executive producers. The movie just changed far too many times, giving you more questions than answers. Family on the beach, a supposed home invasion, planes crashing, a brat obsessed with Friends, hackers start the end of the world, animals migrate for no apparent reason, son is poisoned by radiation yet no one else is and not to mention the blatant racial themes etc. Just a heaping mess of a pile. None of the characters are developed and slowly turn against each other. Situations like these would bring you together, not force you apart. You’d come to hate a few others, such as the daughter who treats Friends like a god and the other daughter, Ruth, who not only has a spoiled attitude but she assumes things on everyone and also believes you should never trust white people. I wish I were joking. And I quote: "I'm asking for you to remember that if the world falls apart, trust should not be doled out easily to anyone, especially white people." This had no relevance to the film at all! If this statement was flipped around, watch how things would go. I guess her name “Ruth” is short for ruthless. Because she did not act nice to anyone, not even her own father at times. If they removed her from the script, it would have made this film somewhat better. But not enough to save it. But the fact this made it through production baffles me. Then again, remind yourself of who the executive producers were. As for the “terrorist” act itself, it just isn’t clear which nation is the main driving force of it all. First some Arabic country to then either Korea or China. No idea because this is never answered. Nor were a lot of things. Where was the military? The actual forces of the nation. Apparently they do not exist, so everyone has to fend for themselves. Granted we do live in a technological world, but planes wouldn’t be crashing nor boats intentionally grounding themselves if everything was hacked. Analog exists. Pilots can still operate a plane without working apparatus etc. I’d go on but other reviews capture the level of frustration this “movie” brings the table. It’s bad. At least the daughter got to watch the last episode of Friends, after running off with neither brains nor brawn. Ate a large supply of food and somehow, found a VHS tape that oh so conveniently had Friends. Leaving her family to die. I wonder what she’ll think after the episode is over. Probably happiness, not a care for her family, as a show takes more priority than the end of the world." If I could give this movie a rating less than one star I would!!!

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 6 months ago

This is a perfect simulation of unhinged 90s/00s chain emails your aunt would forward you. All it’s missing is a title like “FW: FW: FW: FW: OPEN, very important!!!!!” and instructions to forward it to more people.

[-] Lolman228@kbin.social 29 points 6 months ago

God it even sounds like trump

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

Trump would never use a big word like "apparatus" when something more at a 4th grade reading level will do

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] loie@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

oh wow that exact review is clearly being bot reposted

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assembly@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Wow that review is being copy/pasted everywhere and reposted to multiple review sites under many usernames. I thought the movie was pretty good and it’s based on a book that doesn’t answer the questions that the viewer is asking. That is part of the story l, not REALLY knowing what is going on. It’s like the whole theme, not to know for sure. It mentions the military in the final scenes so we have a guess on what they are up to.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

It feels like somebody get a printout of the events of the story without any context or meaning. Like the last comment says the girl left her family to die. No. The entire family is meeting her at the bunker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Totally how normal people behave.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 26 points 6 months ago

Makes me want to go watch it. Racist idiots gonna be racist idiots.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

It's worth a watch. Don't read anything else about it before watching.

[-] MyDearWatson616@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

It's not great. Definitely more than 1 star but I watched it the other day and couldn't remember a thing about it until looking up the plot summary just now. It's one of those movies that could be amazing if it stuck the landing but I personally don't feel like it did. I voted for Obama twice so my opinion is not politically motivated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 20 points 6 months ago

It seems extremely trivial for Google to automatically delete all those identical reviews. Why they aren't doing this? On play store many times they delete my reviews because they think it's irrelevant to the product, here where they're all identical?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is why we can't have nice things

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Nice of them to make it really easy to filter from good faith reviews.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My local trump trump supporter LOVED it and recommended I watch it. Despite the Obamas involvement (his words more or less).

He has the whole survivalist kink thing though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

The movie is pretty bad tbh.

[-] GutsBerserk@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Solid movie. Watched it a week ago. Had no idea who was behind it.

[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Okay but it is definitely a garbage movie. The plot is terrible. Come on, guys.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Eh, it wasn't great, but far from "garbage". There's more than 2 scores.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It was alright, suspenseful but I didn't get the deer part

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I have read that it somehow symbolizes nature trying to warn us about climate change or something but that doesn't make sense to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
373 points (96.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

33925 readers
348 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS