this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

Games

32003 readers
1480 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who wants to bet the damage caused and profit gained by this action was a lot higher than this?

[–] flyboy_146@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...but it's a start. And it will have a bigger impact than if there was no penalty at all. 🤷

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, absolutely. Still, fines for fortune 500 companies should always be damage+profit gained from the action times two.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would say damage + profit + %revenue. It should be made to sting.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, that would work too. As long as they gain absolutely nothing every time they get caught it should already work but I‘m okay with either solution. Just the current situation needs to end soon.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Good that some governments still enforce customer rights against the ever more prevalent attitude in gaming and tech of "you bought it but we still own it"