this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Android

27636 readers
182 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as Android remains open-source, someone will always provide an alternative version if Google restricts the "official" OS

[–] 6jarjar6@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What other phones besides pixel, has an open boot loader?

[–] ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good question. I believe OnePlus (or at least they used to), but I'm not sure.

[–] Socket462@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am using an OnePlus 8T and can confirm that, even if the bootloader does not come unlocked by default, it is very easy to unlock and flash and can also very easily go back (backup is needed because locking back will wipe the phone). Done myself.

[–] freddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have a oneplus 8t also. It was very easy to unlock the bootloader and install lineage on it. There's also the MSM tool that unbricks the phone as well. There's also a way to update the firmware without installing OOS, which is nice.

[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I know at least some Xiaomi phones do. At least both of the ones I've had in the past were pretty painless to flash.

[–] Zephyr_0713@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I don't think so, since that is one of the factors that makes Android "unique" as a mobile operating system since it gives you the freedom to install the app you want, it is in the official store or not

(sorry for my English)

[–] 03ari@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It won't be possible since even Apple is considering the possibility of sideloading apps because of EU's competition policy legislation. If Google does the same, i guess they'll just take a pretty good fine again

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I think this is Google's long-term plan.

[–] MusketeerX@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For "official" Android products, maybe eventually.

In fact I can see a future where all computing/devices are locked down and become appliances, much like your tv or fridge.

You use them how you're "meant to". Sideloading? Programming? Tweaking? Why do you need to do that, are you a terrorist?

I hope we don't get to that world, but for a while now I've been thinking it looks like a possible outcome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I was surprised when some recent Android introduced the option for non-GPlay apps to auto-update on the background.

Maybe it's just so that Google can avoid be called a monopoly, same with their support of Firefox.

EU also has some regulations in mind to force these vendors to allow installation of other apps, so we'll see.

[–] THE_STORM_BLADE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope, Android itself is not restrictive, it's the extra add-ons by vendors that cause restrictions.

[–] Quill0@lemmy.digitalfall.net 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is it.

I switched to Pixel phones ordered from Google. I can replace the software with whatever and not worry about breaking an eFuse warranty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

AOSP at the very least, but the average consumer doesn't really care much about Google Play Services or their Mainland China substitutes (obv cos great firewall).

[–] mobley@ani.social 1 points 1 year ago

There will always be a fork of AOSP even if google ditches it the community will keep it up.

[–] Cryxtalix@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sideloading must always remain available, but I feel like restricting the ability to unlock sideloading might be potentially beneficial. There have been reports of people getting their bank accounts emptied after sideloading some random app and giving it accessibility permissions. Preventing people from granting such permissions on impulse with a more tedious unlocking process could potentially benefit some.

Of course people will disagree. Why should we be inconvenienced for some idiots? It comes down to how willing you are to be inconvenienced for the safety of these people I guess. I already know I'll probably be downvoted given the tech inclined crowd on lemmy these days, but I personally wouldn't mind performing an adb command or smth. Something like executing an adb command once is a relatively small price to pay imo.

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well think of it this way:

The one of the common ways for someone to get their (windows) computer hacked is to get tricked into executing a .exe file. Hey why not block programs unless they are approved by windows? Let's call it Windows 10 S, S for Secure! (/sarcasm)

I mean maybe we could compromise a bit and hide the sideloading behind the developer options. Not connecting to a computer and ADB, just behind the developer menu. Most people don't even know how to get that menu, and the people who sideload will either already know it, or can easily find out after a quick internet search. As long as there is an option, I'll be able to find it.

[–] ThaijsClan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually you may not be too far off. Noticed recently that users don't have access to their Android>OBB or Data folders anymore through the normal files app. I know there is a workaround but I haven't been able to get it to work. This may not affect downloading/installing apk's from other sources, but if you have to manually install the OBB/Data you cannot do that.

[–] LeHappStick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is weird, I have a Redmi Note 9s and my phone comes with both a xiaomi files app and a google files app. I can't see the data or obb folders with the xiaomi one but I can read and modify them with the google app one.

So I assume this limitation is only for third party apps?

[–] FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

So I assume this limitation is only for third party apps?

Indeed, system apps can work around these restrictions.

load more comments
view more: next ›