this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Generative AI-powered tools are making it easy to create deepfakes — and lawyers are trying to seize the moment as an opportunity.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Saganastic@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it would be great if we had digital signatures for videos. Sort of like https, or a signed exe on windows. A video could be cryptographically signed at the time of creation. There could be some level of confidence then that if you're watching a signed video it's an unadulterated original copy created by say, Peter's iphone on July 5, 2023 at 11 pm.

[–] bobtheowl2@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That will get tricky as the second you upload a video to youtube or any cloud service, it gets transcoded into dozens of other different sized and formatted videos, which will effectively strip all that out. But I'm sure we could still come up with some solution that uniquely identify the source somehow.

[–] bobtheowl2@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's almost like we need(dare I say it) ... a non-fungible token

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The reality is that we're past the point where videos constitute useful evidence unless you can strongly demonstrate the integrity of the source against manipulation. You have to have a credible witness say "I taped this" or a security camera you are extremely confident has not been breached, etc.

Video on its own is not sufficient with where the technology is. You might be able to point to most outputs of public tools and find artifacts, but it's close enough that pixel perfect fakes are entirely plausible, especially for lower resolution/compressed videos.

[–] style99@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The standard for legal proof has always been stronger on the motive/opportunity side than on the method side. This just lends some wind to those sails.

[–] Venutianxspring@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think this works as well on dark themes, but I'll mess with the settings

load more comments
view more: next ›