180
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 58 points 5 months ago

The biggest threat from AI isn't it going all Skynet on us, but how rich people will use it to the detriment of the rest of us.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago

I'd honestly prefer skynet. At least it'd be instant

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago

Oh don't you worry, we'll probably get a nuclear war within the next few decades, it just won't be caused by an evil AI

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I’d honestly prefer skynet. At least ~~it’d be instant~~ we'd be able to fight back

Against the rich, we have no chance.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 42 points 5 months ago

All this technology, and none of it is being used to help employees. It's all being used as weapons to punish them.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago

And the worst thing is, punishing them won't even lead to increased productivity so it is entirely pointless.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 months ago

Because it's not about productivity, it's about obsessive control.

If it really was about productivity, most places would consider 4-day workweeks, flexible time-off, bathroom breaks without punishment, additional training and support to those who need it, a focus on work/life balance, and just basically treating workers like human beings and not robots.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

Since I'm a team leader at Deutsche Telekom (the mother company of T-Mobile btw), here what AI basically does: You know the whole "some calls may be recorded for training purposes" thing, right? Depending on the topic your team does and how many calls that brings with it, it's rather tiring and time consuming to listen to all of them. AI will analyze the calls and try to point out those that are worth listening to... Or better: those it believes are worth listening to. It's analysis doesn't have any weight of it's own, the team leader still does all the real analysis, feedback, etc. So if the AI is full of shit, the employee doesn't get punished. If the AI is weirdly biased against someone, it'll not have any repercussions besides this tool being less useful to me.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 months ago

That it if they don't use AI to replace call center staff.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Appreciate the real world feedback. Unfortunately, it's anecdotal and doesn't really address what other companies may be doing with these tools. It may not even address everything your own company is doing with it. Most places are very compartmentalized, and things like cyber security and performance monitoring tools will be strictly need-to-know.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

That's something only lawmakers can fix.

Performance Monitoring Tools cannot be need to know at my workplace. The article talks about our worker's councils, right? Those need to be informed if any tool is to be used in that regard, they even need to approve many tools before they can be used at all.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


From algorithms firing staff without human intervention to software keeping tabs on bathroom breaks, technologies including artificial intelligence are already upsetting workers and unsettling workplaces.

In Europe, unlike in the US and Canada, many unions have been pushing for years for protections against some of the more intrusive ways that AI tools track and manage workers.

“This issue has yet to be put at the center of the radar for unions in North America,” said Valerio De Stefano, a labor law professor at York University in Toronto, who has written extensively on AI’s use in the workplace.

Dan Reynolds, the Communications Workers’ assistant research director, said the union has long been concerned about how new technologies affect jobs.

“In sectors where performance monitoring and algorithmic management are present, you can have a lot of negative impact,” said Amanda Ballantyne, director of the AFL-CIO’s technology institute.

Employers “recognize that engaging in an inclusive dialogue about using new technologies is critical to fostering a culture of trust with employees”, he added.


The original article contains 1,179 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Could be worse, like in China some has surveillance in the bathrooms, so the workers won't slack off

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
180 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16105 readers
212 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS