it's almost like changing the figurehead doesn't affect the foreign policy, who'd've thunk it
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
48 points (79.3% liked)
US News
1997 readers
161 users here now
News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
listen Jack, i healed the soul of the nation. Many people are saying this. We have the best soul. Very large, very handsome soul. Eh, where am i and why does it smell like burnt toast?
"and, despite the incredibly virulent mass delusion that he was a secret agent of Moscow, spent his entire term ramping up cold war hostilities against Russia with extreme aggression."
i'm calling bullshit on this article...
You know Russiagate was a hoax, right?
you do know attaching "gate" to everything is a deliberate right wing tactic to make scandals seem like gibberish, right?
if you're arguing that Donald Trump was secretly working for Russia, I assume you have some actual evidence
you do know that the democrats are right-wing and that you're spreading their mccarthyite gibberish, right?
https://farside.link/invidious/watch?v=eKCkeCXIHTc
https://www.racket.news/p/eleven-minutes-of-media-falsehoods
Any particular reason why?
The article is clearly pointing out the one thing both parties would have done, regardless. American foreign policy is mostly centered on creating instability in the Middle East. Name an administration that wasn’t complicit in sanctioned murder.
Anyhow the article conflates all of the things Trump was feared to do and settles on one thing he didn’t get a chance to do. Coolsies.