so happy to see prokewiki linked
After reading your comment and I looked through the sources cited. Besides the initial source (i.e. linked article) being from a place I never heard, and the 'increase' in cost of oil purchased $74 → $76 (which, if I understand correctly, is a minor increase and doesn't seem to take inflation into account; without calculating or knowing my sense is that it's not meaningful) what part is 'fake news'? I'm trying to understand and I don't really get it.
The link and info stated in the linked article which links to Foreign Policy is legitimate from what I can tell. I skimmed it, and it seems completely in order.
I prefer western eurasia myself, though i respect your choice too of
That sounds hilarious, do you have a link by any chance?
Christ, you made me spit out my water laughing.
Can you share some specific examples of what he shared and what the context was broadly?
Rather poorly actually. The advent of commodified space travel has resulted in the need for adherence to the speculative market and consists of mechanical failure after failure. The profits and benefits which NASA brought (and still brings) are funnelled into fewer people and people who do not require more resources. The idea that private space companies can compete with a public option is laughable. It's only due to the progress of technology and disparity in wealth which individuals and companies can own which allows for this. The lack of a public option is a feature, inefficient planning is a feature, cycles of hype and manufactured consent is a feature, as is the idolatry and abysmal working conditions associated with these private space ventures.
Jeez, imagine mirror's edge style parkour here. Would definitely appreciate more green.
By 3 reinstalls do you mean you were distro-hopping, if so which did you use and what did you like?
I wouldn't have put it as crudely, but you captured the essence of what I was thinking.
Does anyone have any examples of Linus genuinely admitting he made a mistake or was wrong in a way where he dealt with a modicum of consequence? I can't think of any, but I don't watch him very much, at least recently.
to do my best to engage in good faith, could you let me know what you think about this interview with the person who took the famous 'tank man' photo?
it's from cbs news: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/tank-man-photographer-reflects-on-30-years-since-tiananmen-square/