this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
87 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

1345 readers
159 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

remember, kids - if you see something,

...hit it with a port mirrored packet sniffer.

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 14 points 10 months ago

I didn’t even hook ours up to the WiFi. For our use, there is no conceivable advantage and this is the downside.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

My mom reminded us frequently.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now where can we get this port mirrored packet sniffer? But seriously, how do you do this?

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

if your switch gear will mirror traffic, then push the traffic to a switchport with a PC running software like wireshark/tshark/tcpdump or your fav. packet sniffer of choice. different setups (integrated wireless, fibre, etc) will require various configuations to packet capture properly,, but you can always find a way of observing traffic - even if you have to use an old hub (not a switch) as a last resort and just flood the traffic to your monitoring device.

once you have a packet trace, things get fun. if the traffic is in the clear (not encrypted) you get all the goods. if its encrypted (and you cant man-in-the-middle attack the crypto session) then, at the very least, you get patterns, timings, IP endpoints, etc...

on higher end switch and router gear (and some open source consumer routers) its pretty easy to sniff traffic and a great learning experience, not to mention the ability to monitor traffic gives you insight into what devices are doing "things" on your network. highly recommended playing with it on a spare laptop to get some experience with it.

Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems often make use of this type of traffic visibility. so do ISPs (and others) for various purposes, of which some usecases are highly privacy unfriendly.

edit: fixed a few obvious typos and added the IDS stuff.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 months ago

Remember when washing machines were controlled by rotating cams and microswitches?

Why the hell does a washing machine have a network connection?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Eh, was going to learn more, but basically it's the tweet plus summary of silly answers he got and nothing more.

My suspicion is that maybe it got compromised and used for DDoS botnet.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if that’s the case, it’s a good reason to not connect it. If lg doesn’t secure their device well enough then they should not use it.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh I don't argue about that. I personally try to avoid anything "smart" primarily for privacy concerns.

I was just curious what the cause was. In another comment someone suggested that the washing machine was eavesdropping which would be consistent with usage was mostly uploading, but I think 5.7GB would be too much data, unless it was uncompressed.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I’d bet it is uncompressed. There is probably the cheapest slowest processor in there that they could get away with.

What do they care if they eat up your bandwidth?

Then can easily compress it once it arrives wherever it’s going.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

My LG washer is not sending that much data. Maybe the guy is blocking the phone home and it got in a loop trying to call home.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

So glad I don't live in CHYNA