this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
57 points (95.2% liked)

Solarpunk

5314 readers
4 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6081311

This is the background art for the cover. Before I share the full cover, I wanted to give a peak at what artist Sean Bodley has done for the background.

You can find more of his work at https://seanbodley.com/ and support him at patreon.com/seanbodley .

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like it. Not sure I'd like living in that city, but it certainly triggers thoughts and makes you feel there.

[–] beSyl@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would you not livijg in that city? It seems awesome! A bit more green, plants/trees, and it would be awesome.

[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We have abolished physical labor yet I see several people in that picture pedaling to transport a small volume of things, Shenzhen style 20 years ago. I see what looks like small shops: labor inefficient, and inefficient for consumers too. Above ground piping. These are sign of overall poverty IMO.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oof, I don't think that's his best work

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's kind of a crappy thing to say.

You could just say, "I really like his work."

[–] Gnorv@feddit.de 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To me it seems like not so harsh ciritisism, perfectly okay.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

My complaint isn't that it's harsh: it's that it's non constructive.

Good criticism offers encouragement to improve something. Just saying something is disappointing to you is really just discouraging.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I do like his work, but this one seems almost like it wasn't finished or something, the details look odd and it just isn't great compared

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's actually not complete: it's the background. The full image will debut in a day or so, I just wanted to build anticipation.

But that's beside the point. The point is that saying you don't like a piece of art is non-constructive criticism. I think it's discouraging and unkind to artists to offer criticism that isn't in some way constructive.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Since when is it not okay to criticize art?

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

I think it’s discouraging and unkind to artists to offer criticism that isn’t in some way constructive.

I think criticism is great: when it's constructive.

That's when you say what you'd like to make the art better. To issue constructive criticism, all you have to do is say WHAT you don't like, so that the artist can learn and -- assuming they want to make art you like better next time -- incorporate that feedback. That's what constructive criticism means.

[–] Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actual art criticism is a bit more nuanced and based on a fundamental grounding of understanding with the medium.

If you walk up to a Jackson Pollock painting and say 'That's bad', literally no one interested in painting will call your statement art criticism.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But... Jackson Pollock's 'art' is bad

[–] Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think that? Have you ever seen one in person, up close?

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Come on, who hasn't been to the MOMA? Honestly I was kinda joking, I'm not a fan of abstract splatter-type arts, to me that kind of thing seems incredibly self centered of the artist and ofter low effort or wasted effort without conveying a universal beauty of any kind and instead forcing viewers to have to accept that the artist must have seen something that they don't... It's not friendly or inviting as an experience for anyone that isn't in the "know", you know?

[–] Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

I have to agree that a lot of 'modern' art is pretentious and self-indulgent, for this one artist I put aside my distaste after seeing one up close. It's not just paint splatters, there's work in the texture. They're more of kind of 3d art than anything.

That said, thinks like that joker who taped a banana to a gallery wall just piss me of to no end.

[–] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wowzy! Had not seen this artist before, really great pieces of work he's got 🌻

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

I'm a big fan. He's got a lot of diverse stuff, including some quick sketches of people around town and things, which I think are really delightful.

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This looks kind of like an old expressway that was converted into a town.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Just a heads up that the Patreon is giving a 404.

[–] cumberboi@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

oo yea, this is the one listed on the website that seems to be working https://www.patreon.com/seanbodley

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks. It looks like the url accidentally included the period at the end of the sentence.

I fixed it!

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah. The button looks like a little copy button for me. It's like two squares overlapping.