this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
1096 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59680 readers
3742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For your simple[r] tax needs: https://directfile.irs.gov

Mastodon source

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 134 points 10 months ago (15 children)

As a non US citizen this is just a Robin Williams in Jumanji moment...

WHAT YEAR IS IT?!?!

Anyways, welcome to the year of the interwebs.

Have you got rid of your cheques and faxes yet? πŸ˜‰

[–] TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)

interwebs

It’s called β€œthe information superhighway”, thank you very much. πŸ˜„

[–] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh we can file our taxes online, we're just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Oh we can ___, we're just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

Basically America.

[–] theatomictruth@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I still write 2 cheques a year because my water bill can only be paid via physical mail (or in person I guess), I’m pretty sure fax is still common in our medical industry.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 94 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Just a heads up it’s only available for the following states:

Arizona California Florida Massachusetts Nevada New Hampshire New York South Dakota Tennessee Texas Washington state Wyoming

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Yeah, bummer. I'll have to wait I guess.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Which is funny considering this is only for federal and not state taxes. Do they say why it’s limited to specific states?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most of the listed states do not have state level income taxes. The only exceptions are Arizona and California. The rest of the states have no state level income tax. Alaska is the only state without a state level income tax that isn't included in this IRS scheme.

I imagine there is a reason all but two of the chosen states lack a state level income tax.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's a trial program, to work out the major kinks, issues, and problems before rolling it out further to other states.

It's also federal-only, meaning you still have to do your state returns. Most of the states in the trial have no state income tax, which makes it an ideal solution for taxpayers in those states.

Expect it to expand to all 50 states in the coming years, presuming Republicans don't somehow manage to legislate it into oblivion like usual.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 94 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Damn only like 20 years behind the rest of the world.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 77 points 10 months ago

Couldn’t hear you over the sound of my freedom

…nevermind, that was somebody rolling coal

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago

I guess canada is 21 years behind now....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago (13 children)

If you aren't able to use this new system, a good second option is freetaxusa.com. Free for most filings and dirt cheap for more complex stuff. Also, they are easier to use than TurboTax.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

It would probably have better adoption if it didn't have such a scammy-sounding name.

[–] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (10 children)

A better idea is to go to irs.gov and use their free file wizard to see which service is free for you. I used 1040.com this year. Last year I used freetaxusa.com, but this year that would not have been free for me due to my change in income. Which service is free depends on your state, income, and income complexity.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I experienced true happiness for a moment. Only one moment.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 65 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Due to lack of public identity infrastructure, filing taxes online in Britain takes a long time. I mean, at least 10 minutes πŸ˜„

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sndrtj@feddit.nl 50 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Why did this take the IRS so long where other nations have been doing this for decades?

[–] Azal@pawb.social 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Turbotax, H&R Block, and the other tax companies are massively wealthy companies that actively lobby to push laws to keep them from being simple. There are states that they have managed to bar the same thing from happening in.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

To clarify, TurboTax isn’t the company, it is Intuit. They are pretty shitty when it comes to lobbying congress on this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The other guy linked the answer, but I'm going to explain it anyway:

In the US, companies have the freedom to ~~bribe~~ lobby our congress members by giving them money that's totally unrelated to their vote you guys. The reasoning behind that being ok is that the congress official in question is still technically free to vote however they choose despite the money given to them. The reason lobbying works is the threat that the congress person might not get that money next time if they vote against that company's interests.

Just so you all know, because our congress members make a government salary of about 150k-250k/year, it's surprisingly cheap (from a rich company perspective) to lobby them, with lots of payments being in the low thousands. So for obscenely wealthy companies (like intuit), it's much cheaper to pay just enough guys off to kill a movement than for them to suffer the actual consequences of that movement.

In this case, intuit's entire business model depends on American taxes seeming like this mysterious and unapproachable thing that Americans have to pay a third party for in order to not get thrown in jail by the IRS. And given that intuit (and companies like H&R block) rake in billions each year, it's comparatively pennies to pay off congress officials to keep it that way.

-> 'Merica

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago

Lobbyists - quite disgusting.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

Legalized corruption 😎

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 23 points 10 months ago

Same reason why our Healthcare system is fucked, it being fucked helps the Insurance Companies make money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aeharding@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (13 children)

I'm 100% for a simple IRS tax return but what the heck is with this?

To use Direct File, you need an IRS account with ID.me.

To get an ID.me account, you need to:

Take a video of your face

If you can't or don't want to take a video of your face, you can have a video call with an ID.me agent who will confirm that your face matches your identification.

Is that really necessary???

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's the same as going to a bank and letting the teller look at your face. It's to prevent someone from stealing your identity using a picture of your ID.

How can they verify the ID is real without physically seeing it? They look up the info but still need to verify that you are the person on the ID.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How have they been verifying mailed in tax forms with no pictures for decades?

Seems like it unnecessarily disenfranchises the poor and the elderly. You have to have access to equipment that can record you and the tech savvy to be able to use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

Ok but how come H&R Block doesn't need to do this? I just give them my IRS PIN and the AGI from last year's return. The picture shit feels like a poison pill

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Good thing Intuit (TurboTax) is fighting so hard to keep the current format super slick and cheaper as a private service rather than a centralized government process. Right up there with disbanding garbage pickup in favor of individually contracted services because [checks notes] 7 overlapping truck routes will be cheaper than 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Somebody think of the poor corporations!

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

18F looking for tax filling help

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago

k if u single but looking to file jointly πŸ‘‰πŸ‘ˆ

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Good stuff. Keep in mind that Intuit fought this for a very long time. But since they finally got stomped, the IRS can do it's thing now.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

why is it the US is hellbent on making everything a state by state issue but at the same time saying federal law is above state law in such cases like Texas but states with legal cannabis or states with legal abortion are allowed to be above federal

is the US the United States or not

make it make sense

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

The things that the federal government is responsible for are laid out in the Constitution, everything the Constitution does not place into the responsibilities of the federal government is left to state or local authorities.

Tenth Amendment:

Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's 50 states in a trench coat

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

make it make sense

We're a slightly tighter coupled EU with less history of separation. We're states that are united. Not one big ol unified country.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

IDK why people are downvoting you, that's essentially how it works. Everything is super interconnected now, but it wasn't always that way and the constitution hasn't been updated to reflect it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 23 points 10 months ago (4 children)

If you lived in a state not listed here, the District of Columbia, or a U.S. territory, Direct File won't support your tax filing needs.

lol I guess not for me!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How could they launch this and not support login.gov for the auth...

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No Login dot gov

No support in most states

No ACA filers

No app payments

Lots of reason to be frustrated. BUT! This is an absolutely delicious blow to the Intuit lobbyists and if it can handle the simplest of the simple, think of the green light they’ll have towards eventual global parity!

Been so bad (and evil) for so long, I’m in the mood to celebrate more than nitpick. (No Login dot gov I will say is the funniest thing not to be considered MVP - understandable but funny.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thanks Brandon

Honestly I'll hope reservations and congratulations till after we see how it goes, but the fact it's a limited pilot makes me optimistic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί