this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
186 points (96.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Governments should not be allowed to burn books.

Private citizens should be allowed to burn any books they own.

Neither governments nor private citizens should be allowed to harm or threaten people who burn their own damn books.

Example: you can purchase a dozen copies of "On The Origin of Species", burn them, and I will very happily not threaten to behead you. Easy.

[–] Roxxor@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“The bill will make it punishable, for example, to burn the Quran or the Bible in public. It will only aim at actions in a public place or with the intention of spreading in a wider circle,” Hummelgaard said

Hummelgaard told a news conference that the recent protests were “senseless taunts that have no other purpose than to create discord and hatred.”

I agree with Hummelgaard. Those "protests" are used to create hatred. Even though it is also for me not comprehensible how people can be so sensitive about this, we all know the reaction it provokes. And even though we don't agree and comprehend those feelings, we can still respect those feelings and just not senselessly create disruption. And hey.... You can still burn as many Qurans in your private oven as you want.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The intent is secondary to the effect. If certain muslim people cannot put their religious sensibilities BELOW the secular human rights of their fellow country men, they LITERALLY need to leave. They are literally bad for us, and our social, secular order. EXACTLY like the hardcore christians are bad for human rights in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

“The bill will make it punishable, for example, for people of the same sex to kiss in public. It will only aim at actions in a public place or with the intention of spreading in a wider circle,” Hummelgaard said

I agree with Hummelgaard. Those “protests” are used to create hatred. Even though it is also for me not comprehensible how people can be so sensitive about this, we all know the reaction it provokes. And even though we don’t agree and comprehend those feelings, we can still respect those feelings and just not senselessly create disruption. And hey… You can still kiss as many people of the same sex in private as you want.

This isn't an exaggeration: a few weeks ago in Ottawa we had anti-LGBT protests where rainbow flags were burned down -- guess who was there? And while many of us were offended and appalled, nobody was threatened or beheaded in response, and we didn't have politicians trying to pass a new law forbidding the burning of rainbow flags either.

The whole point of this is that in Europe we have fought for centuries in order to establish liberal democracies where freedom of speech and the separation of church and state are enshrined. We must not appease extremists who achieve change with threats of violence. There is a name for that.

In a democracy the act of burning a book, or a flag, is a canary in the coal mine: you know there is trouble when it dies.

The message is simple: we don't threaten people who have different ideas.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (17 children)

We can not have a modern society where people feel strongly about religion. And there is really no point in appeasement of fundamentalists - they don't want a compromise they allays want it all.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blasphemy laws being expanded in 2023. Not what I think people would have predicted in, say, 1990.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 64 points 1 year ago (15 children)

While I'm sure most people doing this are just irl trolls looking for outrage rather than making any deeper political point, the return of blasphemy laws to Europe after we spent so long removing them and lowering religions influcance seems like a backwards step.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Soooooo, did Danish government just announce that they will fold and accept any demand if enough people, not necessarily even living in Denmark, make threats of terrorism and murder? Because it kinda sounds like they did...

Woder if it would also work for, I don't know, universal basic income, 3-day weekends or lower taxes?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 60 points 1 year ago

Kinda unsettles me a bit. To be clear, I don't want violence. But I also don't think that burning an object should be punishable. And that goes for stuff like my country flag, my pride flag, my bible. People should have the freedom of expression, even if their expression is a bad take or a waste of paper and nylon.

I just wish everyone could be more chill. Half the people need to quit being assholes, and the other half need to take 12 seconds to calm down and not freak out over something small. We have much bigger things to freak out about that we should be (constructively) freaking out about, like the collapse of entire food chains due to overfishing.

[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Fuck religion. Time and time again eroding our rights. Shame on the Danish government who is bending down to violence and superstition.

[–] FlamingHot@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that applies here. Why would you ever burn a Quran IN PUBLIC? If you are not religious, or subscribe to other religions, why would you even own a quran? Quran burning in public has only one purpose, to provoke hate. Same as burning flags in public. Or hating certain groups of people in public. None of it is allowed or ok to do.

If you burn that thing at home or throw it in the trash, nobody will care. Otherwise it just falls into the "incite violence" category of things, because that is exactly the thing you are doing.

If moslems then go into a rage and be violent themselves, that isn't ok either, that should be clear.

[–] moldimolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (11 children)

You should be allowed to display your beliefs in public, regardless of how enraged they might make others. You shouldn't be allowed to make direct threats, but anything else should be fair game.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

How about banning public book burning in general? Not a lot of good memories related to that.

Want to keep burning books? Have waste collection services provide a pickup point. Then they can do it in some industrial incinerator so you'll have your book burned but without providing media with an easy outrage (unless you wanted outrage?).

Book burning seems to be a tool of right wing extremism, even when it's used against right wing extremists of some other kind, there's very little benefit to the society.

Also obligatory, fuck organized religion.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sending clear message that violence is an acceptable and working political tool. Climate protesters need to up their game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There seems to be deep misunderstanding why this is troublesome.

The Government burning any book is bad.

A private citizen should be allowed to burn any book he/she wants.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

You can still burn the Quran at home according to the law.

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Thats a very thin defence. The point is that private citizens should be allowed to burn their own belongings as a form of protest/expression. That's effectively been banned now.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] agrammatic@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

It's an exceptionally bad idea to get the state involved in picking which interpretations of a religion are going to be defended.

Cyprus pretty much has this kind of law, and the Chruch loves tormenting even dissenting Christian theologians or prominent people of faith who disagree with the Church with it, let alone critics who aren't part of the religion at all.

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

How about no?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

Full title: "Danish government to put forward law making burning Quran and other religious texts illegal "

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago

Anybody who publicly mocks or insults the religious doctrine or worship of any religious community lawfully existing in this country will be punished by fine or imprisonment for up to 4 months

So Denmark got this Blashemy Law off of the books in 2017, and they're ready to bring it back.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fucking Assholes, Apologists and Democracy Enemies.

Fuck that and them.

[–] sugarcake@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)
  • it has to be passed in a democratically elected parlament. It may not get passed.
  • it is an extension of an existing law that forbid burning of flags (except the Danish flag Dannebrog)
  • book burnings are for morons
  • fuck you
[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(except the Danish flag Dannebrog)

So burning the national flag is allowed?

[–] sugarcake@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, I am proud to say that it is. Burning the danish flag is barely a provocation. The law is intended to stop individuals from provoking or threatening foreign nations, who may feel differently.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Denmark over here negotiating with terrorists.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Negotiating? I'm thinking more of a word that rhymes with "urrender".

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Bade@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Wow, giving in to the threats of people from another side of the planet. Plus don't they really have any idea what it says about non-Muslim people? Especially women? And of course children!?

[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Can they still draw Mohammed though?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This comes after a string of public desecrations of the Quran by a handful of anti-Islam activists sparked angry demonstrations in Muslim countries.

It will only aim at actions in a public place or with the intention of spreading in a wider circle,” Hummelgaard said, adding that it would be punishable by fines or up to two years in prison.

Hummelgaard told a news conference that the recent protests were “senseless taunts that have no other purpose than to create discord and hatred.”

Denmark’s government has repeatedly distanced itself from the desecrations, but has insisted that freedom of expression is one of the most important values in Danish society.

Last month, he said the government would seek to legally prevent burnings of the Quran or other religious scriptures, saying it “only serves the purpose of creating division in a world that actually needs unity.”

The three parties in the governing coalition control 88 seats and are also supported by the four lawmakers representing the semi-independent Danish territories of Greenland and the Faeroe Islands.


The original article contains 355 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›