174
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Spirit Airlines agreed to pay $8.25 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over its bag fees, attorneys for the plaintiffs disclosed Wednesday.

A group of first-time Spirit flyers who booked their trips through third-party travel sites between 2011-17 sued the airline in 2017, claiming that it did not disclose its bag fees and other extra fees appropriately.

The flyers said the budget airline’s surprise carry-on bag fees were intentionally hidden in an effort to gain profit.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Polydextrous@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

“Company builds entire business model on tricking consumers and overcharging for basic flight needs”

Now let’s do every single airline for operating like fucking organized crime and gouging people for using the previously free space built into the fucking plane. The entire industry is out of fucking date and needs to be done away with

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Everyone has followed airlines into the junk fees market.

You charged 1.99, 2.99 or whatever for random shit all the time. So much so that you probably don't even know about it sometimes.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

"They should disclose all their fees!"

fees get broken out into line items

"Why are there so many fees!"

Like I get what people are saying, but a lot of "fees" are just regular costs of doing business. It's really only for stupid stuff like a "$5 print your ticket at home 'convenience' fee" that are bullshit. It shouldn't be more expensive to use less infrastructure.

[-] jballs@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Members of the class will receive as much as 75 percent of the fees returned to them, though the payout may be lower depending on how many people claim refunds from the suit.

A fine that allows a company to profit off shitty business practices is not a deterrent, it's just the cost of doing business. If people were receiving twice what they were charged in fees, then there might be actual change.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Eh, it's a civil settlement. It was never supposed to be a punishment (it wasn't brought by the government) and pushing for something higher brings its own risks - including the possibility that the legal costs of chasing outweighs what would be paid.

It's not exactly a secret that Spirit charges for bags. While some people are only getting refunded a portion of what they unexpectedly paid, many are getting an unexpected partial refund of a fee they planned on paying

[-] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I flew Spirit regularly for years. Even with the up front bag fees, they were still consistently cheaper in most cases. I could get a first class seat and full baggage service for less than economy on a major airline.

Now, if Spirit didn't expose the baggage fees to customers booked through third parties, then demanded a king's ransom at the baggage counter, that deserves a paddlin'.

[-] Souyo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] jballs@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Frontier used to be such an awesome airline before they pivoted and raced to the bottom.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Fuck Spirit Aitlines.

May they be sued out of existence.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They got bought by JetBlue and are supposed to be combined at some point.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And now what about every other airline

[-] fluke@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Is that it?

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
174 points (100.0% liked)

News

21721 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS