I'm actually starting to think.the reason republicans want him in the oval office is because, due to him being an incompetent insurrectionist moron with the cognitive ability and reasoning faculties of a unripe walnut, he'd be so easy to manipulate into signing into policy any goddamn thing they want him to, in order to cling on to their tenous grip on power.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Hasn't that been the strategy for several decades?
Looking at you, Bush
Ah yes the man elected because people wanted to "have a beer with him."
He felt like a common man because he was the failson; a lay-about black-sheep of a political dynasty spanning 4 generations.
He lost the vote, and, remarkably for POTUSes who lost the vote but won the election, he also lost the election and only won due to a lack of competent counting.
It had nothing to do with beer and everything to do with our system's bad design.
We have to resize the court, before it’s too late.
Them handing the election to W despite his L was the sign it needed to happen, and a mere 20 years later they’re stripping women’s right to bodily autonomy.
And then there was Reagan, who signed off on a bunch of Iran-Contra things and then had Alzheimer's and other kind of dementia melt his brain like the Mission: Impossible self-destructing tape or something
I am not a bright man
If that's the case, why didn't they pass any meaningful bill in the first 2 years of his presidency?
He didn't champion anything, so Congress didn't give him any bills to sign that he wanted.
It's not 3d chess. Hell, it's not even checkers. It's that Republicans are stuck with this moron that a significant, and very loud percentage of their base LOVES.
They did spend a lot of time confirming judges, though
That's why their (second?) favorite former president was an actor. They know how to follow a script.
I think that’s Putin’s strategy. Republicans can’t think that far ahead.
That Jimi Hendrix drawing of Elvis kinda looks like Trump, but we're talking about a kid's drawing....
https://www.musiclipse.com/2023/08/06/the-night-jimi-hendrix-met-the-king-elvis-presley/
He's trying to get attention and these idiots in "journalism" are falling for it.
Who cares about policy when the leading republican candidate prefers to be a Kardashian? /s
Wants their social life to be Kardashian, but wants to rule like a cardassian
I have so few opportunities to repost this.
Still better looking than the Kardashians.
Do we even know what the Kartrashians look like? All I know is the image they paint on their faces.
This should include Major Kira, with her arms crossed, looking smug.
I sure don't disagree with Joe on that one.
Damn he got me cus I was gonna vote for whichever candidate was more like Elvis.
The world loved Elvis. Trump, not so much.
At best you can say he looks like fat Elvis just before he dies on the toilet. Alternatively, he looks more like Elvis does now.
Either one of those makes his statement accurate. Anything aside from that is just the dementia talking.
Maria came from Nashville with a suitcase in her hand
She said she'd like to meet a boy who looks like Elvis