358
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 60 points 4 months ago

Put your calculators away boys. Looks like the store discovered how math works.

[-] BoxerDevil@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Where is the midly infuriating part?

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 81 points 4 months ago

Presenting the pricing as if it represents a bulk discount when it doesn't.

The only reason to do this is to trick people who can't do multiplication into buying more.

[-] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

It probably once did, but they relabeled it.

[-] Quicky@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but only for 1. There would still have been no saving buying 3 over 2.

[-] squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If original price was 9

1 for 9

2 for 18 (deal gives 2 off)

3 for 27 (deal gives 3 off)

If it was 10

1 for 10

2 for 20 (4 off)

3 for 30 (6 off)

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But you don't pay more either. Without the discount on 3 pack, buying odd numbers would've been worse value than even numbers but the 3 pack discount makes all bulk purchases equal.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

gotta jack the price up again to afford more price stickers.

[-] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

It only makes sense they did if the origianl price was higher, which is quite weird unless they specifically don't want people to buy more than 1

[-] Turun@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

I'd argue it's a nice thing to make the costs obvious for people who can't do multiplication.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

You can clearly see there is a sticker over the original price. It originally probably was a bulk deal that the store reduced to an all around deal.

You're over here bitching about people who can't do math and you can't even see.

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I'm bitching? About people who can't do math? That's news to me. Thank god you were there to tell me!

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Why is this downvoted. I had the same question and I was genuinely confused. Are we not allowed to ask questions :x

[-] Carlcarla@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Move to the planet No Bloke's Land

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago

Well 2 is between 1 and 6, 3 is between 2 and 4. So for 4 I’d say anywhere from 35 to 39 dollars. Which is, itself, a spread of 4 so you know it’s right.

[-] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I can't express the embarrassment I feel from how long it took me to understand this.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 months ago
[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They're dissociating the numbers on the right from their normal 2-digit value into being two separate 1-digit values. 16 is not sixteen, it's a one and six. The value of 2 is between 1 and 6.

Same goes with 3 being between 2 and 4.

Then they do even more delightfully dumb shit when extrapolating this logic to 4.

In reality, the things in OPs image are just $8 a piece.

What I'm saying is that this commenter is a fuckin savant.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Math can be tricky

[-] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 18 points 4 months ago

Yeah but how much for 4?

Wish I could tell you, buddy

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ok.... But is ££8 more expensive than £8?

[-] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago
[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

I got a square pound in my pants and I'm not even European.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Then you should change your Depends.

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

If you're ready to pay for that subscription you wanted.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

We haven't yet discovered the mathematics needed to answer that question

[-] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago

I think I figured it out:

The left number is always going one up, while rights number decrease - starting at two - always halves itself.

Therefore 5 should be 42.5

[-] suspect@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago
[-] mckean@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

It was pointed out that the first price was higher originally. The funny thing is that in that case the price of four would be nice to know. With the given information it would be economically more efficient to buy two times two if you wanted four vs one times three and then an additional one.

[-] HotDogFingies@kbin.social 5 points 4 months ago

£3... something?

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Next Generation ™️ apparel teaches math 😄

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
358 points (91.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

33925 readers
226 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS