141

Bridgy Fed made a splash earlier this week by announcing its latest progress in connecting the Fediverse to Bluesky and Nostr. Sadly, not everyone was welcoming.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Corvid@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

This insane isolationism from the vocal minority will kill ActivityPub. The fact that the author is now backing down and switching to an opt-in system is infuriating. Makes want to fork the project and host a copy of the bridge that’s opt-out.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago

the funniest thing is when they accuse bluesky of being a transphobic network when it's literally one of the most pro trans networks around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago

Makes want to fork the project and host a copy of the bridge that’s opt-out.

Wouldn't you get defederated fast too?

[-] Corvid@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

That’s exactly the point. Isolationists instances can always defederate bridges if they don’t like them. This outrage is them imposing their will on the rest of the fediverse.

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 14 points 4 months ago

Framing it as isolationists is ludicrous.

I love the idea of an Internet without borders, but there needs to be some shared values. That's what the ActivityPub protocol provides a platform for. To suggest that everything we do or post should be free is ridiculous. If the communities of BlueSky and Nostfr want to access our content, why don't they switch to ActivityPub and problem solved?

As a point, say that I write a poem and put it on my mastodon and then bridgey scrapes it and copies it. How do we get that taken down? A picture of my kid? A picture of someone else's kid?

There's absolutely no issues with ActivityPub growing, it can encompass the whole internet for all I care, but that needs to come with the protections, provisions and failsafes that the ActivityPub protocol offers. Bridgey doesn't do that, so again I say… If BlueSky and Nostfr want to pivot to ActivityPub, they're more than welcome, but the Internet I'm trying to build isn't about profiting off of small people without a voice and that's what Bridgey and this isolationism rhetoric tries to do.

[-] Corvid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Bridgy doesn’t scrape anything. It works the same as any other ActivityPub instance, the only difference is that it converts some JSON from one format to another.

It also converts edit and deletion events, so in your scenario it would relay that you want your poem or photo deleted.

This isn’t a web scrapper that reposts content like all the bots reposting Reddit threads to Lemmy. This is a protocol translator between federated networks that speak different languages.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Crickets

Small wonder. A tangent, but I'm also of the opinion that someone shouldn't put their child's photo (or any information) on the internet if they don't want to distribute it in the first place.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

I found the bridgy website a bit confusing, but people who areupset should read through to get a better idea of what it actually does.

Initially I thought it was just scraping and reposting too, but I find what the dev is working towards is very much in the spirit of the fediverse.

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 2 points 4 months ago
[-] Corvid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Not entirely sure what you mean by that. It deletes posts in the same way that any other ActivityPub server does, by federating the deletion request.

It’s up to the receiving servers to handle that request and delete the post. You can easily have an ActivityPub native server that doesn’t honor those requests.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

ActivityPub doesn’t guarantee your post gets taken down on other instances after you delete it. Federation with another site isn’t more a less trustworthy just because it uses AP proper or a bridge.

I think that everyone being on the same protocol is better for compatibility and UX but I think bridges can have their place for those who choose to use them until then.

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 points 4 months ago

There will always be bad actors, but when everything is working properly…

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

why don’t they switch to ActivityPub and ~~problem solved~~ immediately get defederated

FTFY. That's what would actually happen, and you and me both know it. 😛

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 2 points 4 months ago
[-] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 4 months ago

That’s what the ActivityPub protocol provides a platform for.

That's ridiculous. ActivityPub is a standard to allow communication between different systems. What you are saying is that people should only be allowed to speak English if they want to be part of the British Empire and be subjects to the crown.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, no amount of bending the knee will ever be enough for censorious extremists.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 months ago

basically just a bunch of the loud minority on mastodon ruining it for everyone else like always

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 12 points 4 months ago

Mastodon really does seem to rally around braindead takes and misinformation. The culture over there can be hard to stomach sometimes.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

I like the little niche I fit into on mastodon, but the Explore tab is as grumpy as Twitter ever was.

It's a lot like Twitter in that once you follow some good people and get your feed curated you shouldn't look at anything else.

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

You're absolutely right and I definitely shouldn't be making broad statements like that. Another thing I've found is that if you can stomach the effort (or do this from the get go), it's a good idea to put all your academic or professional accounts into a single list. It's nice to check into a slightly smarter feed from time to time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

I understand blocking this bridge, but if admins do that, they should block other bridges too, like bird.makeup

[-] rglullis@communick.news 9 points 4 months ago

bird.makeup is not a bridge in the proper sense, it only brings content from Twitter to the Fediverse, not the other way around.

[-] NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

It's a crawler that ports things from one platform to another without consent from the user. If either of them are unethical and should be blocked, then both should be blocked.

[-] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Bridgy Fed isn't a crawler, though. It doesn't scrape anything, index anything, or store anything. It's simply a translation layer.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 4 months ago

it's not up to the admins of the destination instances to block it, but of the ones that have their content being drained.

You could argue then that Twitter has the right to block crawlers, which it does. But it was exactly this crackdown and wall-building that made a good portion of us to leave Twitter/Reddit and came to the Fediverse: to defend an open web.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
141 points (94.3% liked)

Fediverse

26737 readers
80 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS