this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
70 points (96.1% liked)

Science

3155 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
70
Science journal retracts peer-reviewed article containing AI generated ‘nonsensical’ images (venturebeat.com)
submitted 8 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/science@mander.xyz
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

How do they do peer-reviews? Evidently it was not enough for what you expect from a vetted journal and what peer-reviews implies.

Any consequences or planned changes?

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

From what I remember reading the company that released this pumps out papers full of gibberish and AI images. Authors can pay money to put their name on these papers to boost their standings in academia.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That rat is packin a hammer

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dck, per the picture. And stem̴͙͛m̴̨̈ cells

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Grow your COCK THREE INCHES in just TWO WEEKS