102
submitted 4 months ago by Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

A US intelligence assessment of Israel’s claims that UN aid agency staff members participated in the Hamas attack on 7 October said some of the accusations were credible but that the claims of wider links to militant groups could not be independently verified… According to the Wall Street Journal, the intelligence report, released last week, declared it had “low confidence” in the basic claim that a handful of staff had participated in the attack, indicating that it considered the accusations to be credible though it could not independently confirm their veracity.

It cast doubt, however, on accusations that the UN agency was collaborating with Hamas in a wider way. The Journal said the report mentioned that although the UNRWA does coordinate with Hamas in order to deliver aid and operate in the region, there was a lack of evidence to suggest it partnered with the group.

It added that Israel has not “shared the raw intelligence behind its assessments with the US”.

Confidence in Assessments, pp 5, per the US’s own National Intelligence Council:

  • Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed.
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago
[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

It’s worth broadcasting, if nothing else to point out that:

  • States lie, including your own state
  • States lie copiously during wartime
  • Israel very likely lied, or at least made a claim without merit
  • The US (and official documents) are calling it out, in the diplomatic phrasing allowed when criticizing a ‘strategic ally’ - this could have been buried or classified easily
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I didn't mean to criticize you for posting it. It was worth posting. I just wish it didn't have to be worth it.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Didn’t take it as such, assumed for the jaded reply it was 👍

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago

But I was told we totally independently verified what Israel said before cutting off aid

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 12 points 4 months ago

It added that Israel has not "shared the raw intelligence behind its assessments with the US".

i.e., Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.

[-] wildtamaskan@yiffit.net 10 points 4 months ago

So the US will reinstate funding to the UNWRA,, right?

Right?

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Too bad Biden won't give a shit.

Gotta give AIPAC their return on investment for half a literal century of donations.

He's taken too much of their money to care at this point, even if he didn't legitimately support their genocide.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
102 points (94.0% liked)

News

21671 readers
4239 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS