this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

31252 readers
638 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Interesting. I wonder if this would restrict access to U.S. phone numbers by scammers if the phone service operators now have to identify who’s buying that access?

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. They'll keep burning through the 9,999,999,999 phone numbers from outside the US but you'll get indicted for a felony for purchasing VPN services outside of US regulations.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean I’m not answering the phone anymore if I don’t know the number, but hopefully my older relatives won’t answer the phone if they see it’s a foreign number, so that would still be an improvement.

This doesn’t apply to foreign service providers, right? Since they’re not subject to U.S. laws? I thought most private individuals try to get VPN service outside the U.S. anyways to reduce the likelihood of the U.S. government finding out what was being done over VPN.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

This doesn’t apply to foreign service providers, right? Since they’re not subject to U.S. laws? I thought most private individuals try to get VPN service outside the U.S. anyways to reduce the likelihood of the U.S. government finding out what was being done over VPN.

Felony for purchasing unregulated services outside of the US. This is a slippery slope argument, but your VPN service in whatever country will be deemed as funding terrorism because they aren't federally regulated. These laws already exist, they just waited to be applied to the political dissonants that don't agree with the two party oligarchy.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is not to protect the public so unlikely as their main goal is to punk us.

Have you noticed how pedo clergy gets away with it but they keep saying they need to scan cell phone for child porn to kEeP KiDs SAfE

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

Not to mention Epstein was able to operate freely for decades while flying out high priority definitely-surveilled-at-all-times targets out to rape kids

Make no mistake, intelligence agencies are every bit as complicit as Epstein himself, and they don’t give a flying fuck about “protecting” kids

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It seems like the US government is predicting that the rise of AI will become a national security issue. They're right.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And oh darn, didn’t you know the only solution is permanent extension of and expansions to all the patriot act bullshit that has been violating our civil liberties constantly for 20+ years?

Shucks. Welp, if it’s “for the children” or whatever excuse they use this time, I guess we have no choice!

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago

What on earth does this have to do with the patriot act?